Over Democratic objections, Senate panel sets Oct. 22 vote on Trump court pick
By Andrew Chung, Patricia Zengerle and Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-led U.S.
By Andrew Chung, Patricia Zengerle and Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-led U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday scheduled an Oct. 22 vote to advance conservative appellate judge Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court to the full Senate for confirmation, rejecting Democratic objections.
The last day of the four-day confirmation hearing for President Donald Trump's nominee began with committee Democrats protesting what they called the needlessly rushed nature of proceedings and complaining that Barrett sidestepped questions about presidential powers, abortion, voting rights and Obamacare.
"I believe that this rushed, sham process is a disservice to our committee," Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal said. "She has been rushed in a way that is historically unprecedented ... and the purpose of doing it is simply to have a justice on the Supreme Court, as the president said, to decide the election and to strike down the Affordable Care Act."
Trump has asked the Senate, controlled by his fellow Republicans, to confirm Barrett before the Nov. 3 U.S. election in which he is seeking a second term in office. Trump has said he expects the court to decide the election's outcome.
Barrett answered questions from senators during marathon sessions on Tuesday and Wednesday. The committee was hearing from outside experts on Thursday including two from the American Bar Association, which deemed her "well qualified" for the job. Barrett was not present.
Barrett's confirmation to the lifetime post - a virtual certainty given that Republicans hold a 53-47 Senate majority - would shift the Supreme Court further right with a 6-3 conservative majority. Barrett is Trump's third nominee to the high court.
Democratic Senator Dick Durbin said Barrett, unlike many prior nominees, avoided answering many questions she should have tackled, including whether a president can delay an election and queries related to transitions of power.
"What was the purpose of this hearing if we've reached the point now where we really don't know what she thinks about any issues?" Durbin asked. "I'd be afraid to ask her bout the presence of gravity on Earth - she may decline to answer."
On Wednesday, Senator Kamala Harris, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's running mate, said that the confirmation proceedings "lack legitimacy" because Americans want the winner of the presidential election to decide who fills the court's vacancy created by the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Harris urged the Senate to take up COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation instead of the confirmation.
The committee on Thursday was hearing from four witnesses in support of Barrett's confirmation, and four against. The bar association, a nonpartisan national lawyers' group, will explain its positive evaluation of Barrett's qualifications related to "integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament."
Barrett if confirmed could be on the Supreme Court in time to participate in a case on Nov. 10 in which Trump and Republican-led states are seeking to invalidate the 2010 Obamacare law formally called the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The law has helped millions of Americans obtain medical coverage and includes protections for people with pre-existing conditions.
Barrett, 48, is a devout Catholic and a favorite among religious conservatives. Barrett said the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide was not a "super-precedent" that could not be overturned.
Barrett drew scrutiny from Democrats when she said it was an "open question" as to whether Trump could pardon himself, while adding that the Supreme Court "can't control" whether a president obeys its decisions.
Barrett also told the committee that she could not opine on whether presidents should commit to peaceful transfers of power if they lose an election. Trump has refused to do so.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York and Lawrence Hurley and Patricia Zengerle in Washington; Editing by Will Dunham)
This story has not been edited by Firstpost staff and is generated by auto-feed.
By Robin Emmott and John Irish | BRUSSELS/PARIS BRUSSELS/PARIS France and Germany will agree to a U.S. plan for NATO to take a bigger role in the fight against Islamic militants at a meeting with President Donald Trump on Thursday, but insist the move is purely symbolic, four senior European diplomats said.The decision to allow the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to join the coalition against Islamic State in Syria and Iraq follows weeks of pressure on the two allies, who are wary of NATO confronting Russia in Syria and of alienating Arab countries who see NATO as pushing a pro-Western agenda."NATO as an institution will join the coalition," said one senior diplomat involved in the discussions. "The question is whether this just a symbolic gesture to the United States
BEIJING Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday called for greater efforts to make the country's navy a world class one, strong in operations on, below and above the surface, as it steps up its ability to project power far from its shores.China's navy has taken an increasingly prominent role in recent months, with a rising star admiral taking command, its first aircraft carrier sailing around self-ruled Taiwan and a new aircraft carrier launched last month.With President Donald Trump promising a US shipbuilding spree and unnerving Beijing with his unpredictable approach on hot button issues including Taiwan and the South and East China Seas, China is pushing to narrow the gap with the U.S. Navy.Inspecting navy headquarters, Xi said the navy should "aim for the top ranks in the world", the Defence Ministry said in a statement about his visit."Building a strong and modern navy is an important mark of a top ranking global military," the ministry paraphrased Xi as saying.