Nearly all the world is applauding the compassionate response of New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Arden to what was arguably among the worst terrorist attacks in recent times. Her crisp utterance of "they are us" while referring to the victims of the Christchurch shootings and her wearing a hijab on her visit to the city are all actions of a leader with a clear moral compass. Such actions are rare indeed and a contrast to the remarks of US president Donald Trump, who was criticised for not reaching out to Muslims at home while condemning the terror attacks on "sacred places of worship".
Arden also trumps the US president's response in other ways. Within 10 days of the incident, she announced reforms in New Zealand's gun laws, a gravely controversial subject in the US. Also, unlike some Indian politicians, Arden did not use the occasion to pad up her political standing, and even more unusually acted strongly to prevent the terrorist's video from his social media livestream from being circulated. That should make some of our TV channels blink.
The 28-year-old Australian shooter, Brenton Tarrant, was a curious person. Travelling through many parts of the world, including Pakistan and North Korea, doesn't seem to have made him any more conscious of the diversity of nations. In Pakistan, he seems to have visited Gilgit Baltistan and praised locals for their kindness. Whether he tried to join any jihadi group in that country has yet to come to light.
Cases across the world indicate that a person bent on violence may switch from one religion or cause to another. This is often apparent among cadre of the Islamic State who are in it for the killing rampage. In the UK, for instance, many Islam converts have a criminal and violent past. In the US, there have been instances where white supremacists switched to radical Islamic beliefs before committing murder. Besides, terrorists of any kind — Left, Right or religious — have long been seen to have strikingly similar motivations.
First, however, it has to be acknowledged that white supremacist and right-wing attacks have been rising in parts of Europe and the US. In the latter case, the perception of immigrants as the 'other' is often blamed on President Trump's policies, which is centred around building a wall along the Mexico border at present. In many cases, the threat from illegal migration in terms of a rise in crime and violence is real, particularly in border states. But the danger arises from the fact that right-wing supremacist ride on these arguments. This makes it hardly surprising that attacks by this group are rising and could become a serious threat to the US itself.
A perceptive article in The Atlantic quoting the respected Anti-Defamation League observes that between 2009 and 2018, right-wing extremists accounted for 73 percent of extremist attacks in the US, dwarfing Islamist terror at 23 percent. Similar figures are reported in the UK, where the police recorded 94,000 hate crimes in 2017, up by 17 percent from previous years. This could well be linked to the horrific terror attacks in that year.
Second, there is another rather overlooked factor that must be noted. The statistics referring to this rise of far-right attacks in the UK were also linked to the Brexit debate and immigration. In simple words, in both the UK and the US, as well as other parts of Europe, hate crimes and far-right terror surges during an economic slowdown. Let's not forget that the last surge of right-wing politics was in the mid 1990s, fuelled by an immigrant wave and an economic downturn. With an economic slowdown in Europe, such incidents could increase.
To return to the present, a commentary on the violence in New Zealand notes the extreme hopelessness in Christchurch after its destruction in an earthquake in 2011 and the rise of right-wing sentiment, often quite unacknowledged. So yes, a deteriorating social or economic situation adds to the danger.
The last issue, however, is equally unacknowledged. The fact is that much of the 'wars' or violent conflicts, where populations have been bombed, strafed or otherwise killed, have been in West and South Asia. The US has been a primary actor in most of these. But there is also the disturbing fact that States like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan have been equally, if not more, violent on their own and neighbouring Muslim populations. It is hardly an accident that Pakistan remains the 'ground zero' of terrorism, since it has a hand to play in most, if not all, of these conflicts.
The lesson is that violence begets violence — racist or otherwise — in an almost linear progression. For instance, nationals from Afghanistan, Syria and Yemen, among others, are viewed with suspicion and often denied entry into most 'white' countries. That process, in turn, increases the perception of these nationals as the 'other', where anyone with a turban is seen as a potential terrorist.
Remember that Brenton Tarrant's rant against the world, which was in his 'manifesto', included a hate against all immigrants, including Indians. Indians have never been involved in terrorist attacks anywhere. But hate crimes and their ideology don't deal with facts. It's all sentiment.
Indians affected by the attack will grieve the deaths of their relatives, while others will wonder at its logic. However, before Indian commentators throw up their hands at the New Zealand terror attacks, it would do well to acknowledge that the perception of the 'other' is growing in this country, as well.
If a white man does the unthinkable, so can a brown one. The hatred runs deep, and like the other such instances, can hardly be blamed on religion. Hinduism, unlike some book-based religions, has nowhere justified attacks on anyone, let alone a small religious minority. The trouble runs deeper and may well again originate in the wallet.
Updated Date: Mar 19, 2019 15:22:32 IST