In a first, US federal judge says Trump administration has disobeyed judicial mandate

In a first, US federal judge says Trump administration has disobeyed judicial mandate

FP Staff February 11, 2025, 11:28:45 IST

The decision seemed to be the first time a judge had determined that the Trump administration had disregarded a court order that halted the implementation of a new policy

Advertisement

On Monday, a U.S. judge ruled that the administration of President Donald Trump had disregarded a court order that lifted a sweeping spending limit on the federal government and ordered the agency to promptly release any money that had been withheld.

The government was still withholding cash, according to a group of Democratic state attorneys general who filed to stop the funding freeze last week. On January 31, U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Providence, Rhode Island, had previously barred the funding freeze with a temporary restraining order.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

The decision seemed to be the first time a judge had determined that the Trump administration had disregarded a court order that halted the implementation of a new policy. The Trump administration said Monday that it is appealing.

“The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the court found, likely unconstitutional and has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm to a vast portion of this country,” McConnell said on Monday. “These pauses in funding violate the plain text of the TRO.”

McConnell said all funding must be restored at least until he can hold a hearing on the states’ motion for a longer-term order.

On Feb. 6, a lawyer with the office of Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James told McConnell that state agencies were still having difficulty accessing federal funds, including billions of dollars for infrastructure projects under the Inflation Reduction Act.

The Trump administration had told states it believed the order did not apply to certain environmental and infrastructure spending, and that some payments were delayed for “operational and administrative reasons.”

However, McConnell said his order had been “clear and unambiguous” in applying to all funding frozen in response to sweeping executive orders by Trump.

The states originally sued the administration over a memorandum from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget announcing a wide-ranging freeze of federal spending. Soon after the lawsuit was filed, OMB rescinded that memo.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

The memo was part of a larger Trump administration push to tighten federal spending and reshape the federal bureaucracy, which has sparked a flurry of lawsuits.

In a separate case over Trump’s push to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, federal employee unions have accused the administration of violating a court order reinstating USAID workers who were placed on administrative leave.

End of Article
Latest News
Find us on YouTube
Subscribe
End of Article

Top Shows

Vantage Firstpost America Firstpost Africa First Sports

QUICK LINKS