In a first, US federal judge says Trump administration has disobeyed judicial mandate

On Monday, a U.S. judge ruled that the administration of President Donald Trump had disregarded a court order that lifted a sweeping spending limit on the federal government and ordered the agency to promptly release any money that had been withheld.

The government was still withholding cash, according to a group of Democratic state attorneys general who filed to stop the funding freeze last week. On January 31, U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Providence, Rhode Island, had previously barred the funding freeze with a temporary restraining order.

The decision seemed to be the first time a judge had determined that the Trump administration had disregarded a court order that halted the implementation of a new policy. The Trump administration said Monday that it is appealing.

More from World

Tariffs, layoffs and policy upheavals: Trump’s turbulent first month in office Government watchdogs fired by Trump sue his administration, seek reinstatement

“The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the court found, likely unconstitutional and has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm to a vast portion of this country,” McConnell said on Monday. “These pauses in funding violate the plain text of the TRO.”

McConnell said all funding must be restored at least until he can hold a hearing on the states’ motion for a longer-term order.

On Feb. 6, a lawyer with the office of Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James told McConnell that state agencies were still having difficulty accessing federal funds, including billions of dollars for infrastructure projects under the Inflation Reduction Act.

Impact Shorts

More Shorts

‘The cries of this widow will echo’: In first public remarks, Erika Kirk warns Charlie’s killers they’ve ‘unleashed a fire’

Trump urges Nato to back sanctions on Russia, calls for 50–100% tariffs on China

The Trump administration had told states it believed the order did not apply to certain environmental and infrastructure spending, and that some payments were delayed for “operational and administrative reasons.”

However, McConnell said his order had been “clear and unambiguous” in applying to all funding frozen in response to sweeping executive orders by Trump.

The states originally sued the administration over a memorandum from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget announcing a wide-ranging freeze of federal spending. Soon after the lawsuit was filed, OMB rescinded that memo.

The memo was part of a larger Trump administration push to tighten federal spending and reshape the federal bureaucracy, which has sparked a flurry of lawsuits.

In a separate case over Trump’s push to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, federal employee unions have accused the administration of violating a court order reinstating USAID workers who were placed on administrative leave.