Democrats step up impeachment investigation of Donald Trump, but harbour doubts about political value of move before 2020 polls

Washington: Democrats stepped up their impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump on Thursday even as the party’s leaders remained dubious about the political value of the move 14 months before the next presidential election. The House Judiciary Committee approved new procedures that will permit it to demand more documents and testimony from the White House, declaring for the first time that its probe of the president is focused on “impeachment”. Committee chairman Jerry Nadler said the measures will serve to enhance an “aggressive series of hearings” aimed at determining whether to recommend articles of impeachment against the president. [caption id=“attachment_7231211” align=“alignleft” width=“380”] File image of US president Donald Trump. AP[/caption] “The resolution before us represents the necessary next step in our investigation of corruption, obstruction, and abuse of power,” Nadler said before it was approved by the Democrat-controlled committee. The investigation is focused along four specific lines — allegations that Trump illegally interfered with the Russia election meddling investigation, that he took part in hush payments to alleged former mistresses, that he has used his office to enrich himself, and that he offered pardons to government and campaign officials to protect him. “The conduct under investigation poses a threat to our democracy. We have an obligation to respond to this threat,” Nadler said. While a significant step closer, there are still doubts about whether Democrats will eventually vote to impeach the president, the equivalent of formally indicting him for a crime. Democratic Party leaders, especially House speaker Nancy Pelosi, have opposed the move as politically risky. Pelosi has indicated she thinks the party should focus on next year’s presidential and congressional elections. In addition, opinion polls show the public generally is against going through the drama of charging the president. And it is virtually certain that the Republican-controlled Senate, which would effectively try the president on the allegations, would acquit him, absent new evidence that adds to what is currently known about the allegations. More than half of the 235 Democrats in the House have endorsed an impeachment investigation. Yet the Democrats have been accused of avoiding the use of the word impeachment in their investigations, and moving too slowly to reach that goal. Nadler defended the investigations of Trump currently being conducted by three separate House committees. “Some call this process an impeachment inquiry. Some call it an impeachment investigation. There is no legal difference between these terms, and I no longer care to argue about the nomenclature,” he said. Nadler’s committee is planning to interview Trump’s former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski next week, and is seeking to question former White House Counsel Donald McGahn. The White House maintains that Trump’s executive privilege gives him the power to prevent McGahn from testifying. McGahn was a key source for the Mueller investigation into Russia meddling, which mapped out at least 10 instances in which Trump appeared to obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice.