China, US pledge $3 billion each to fight climate change
China and the US have pledged $3 billion to help other developing countries combat climate change.
Washington: China has pledged $3 billion to help other developing countries combat climate change.
The China South-South Climate Cooperation Fund will also enhance their capacity to access the Green Climate Fund (GCF), Xinhua news agency cited a China-US joint presidential statement on climate change signed during Chinese President Xi Jinping's state visit to the US.
China and US recognised the importance of mobilising climate finance to support low-carbon, climate-resilient development in developing countries, according to the statement.
In this connection, the US also reaffirmed its $3 billion pledge to the GCF.
In the statement, the Chinese and US presidents reaffirmed determination to implement domestic climate policies, strengthen bilateral coordination and cooperation, and to promote sustainable development and the transition to green, low-carbon as well as climate resilient economies.
The document stated: "(The) United States reaffirms its $3 billion pledge to the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and China announces that it will make available RMB 20 billion (roughly $3.1 billion) for setting up the China South-South Climate Cooperation Fund to support other developing countries to combat climate change, including to enhance their capacity to access GCF funds.
You can read the full text of the joint statement here.
A trillion dollars a year spread across these seven economies would translate to about two percent of their pre-pandemic GDPs, the report calculated.
David Attenborough to address political leaders at UN summit about tackling 'crippling' threat of climate change
“No better person to build momentum for further change,” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said about David Attenborough, who has been appointed 'people’s advocate' at the November global summit.
Nathaniel Rich's Second Nature brings to fore devastating results of man-made alterations to the natural world
Many people don’t know yet how to respond to widespread environmental and public health crises as well as ethical quandaries that pop up in decisions about where we live, the food we eat, what species’ genes we modify, and what environments we want to conserve.