SpaceX Falcon Heavy booster may be lost to sea despite perfect landing last week

SpaceX aced a **triple-landing of its Falcon Heavy booster rockets** after launching its first-ever commercial cargo into orbit last week. Soon after, the vehicle fell into the ocean on its way back from the drone-ship owing to rough seas. The booster recovery team hasn’t been able to recover the middle (core) booster of the Falcon Heavy for its return home to SpaceX’s port in Cape Canaveral. Conditions only got worse after the recovery team loaded the booster onto the ship, with eight to ten-foot waves that shifted and kept the rocket from remaining upright, **a report** in The Verge said. [caption id=“attachment_6434591” align=“alignnone” width=“1280”] The Falcon 9 Heavy lifting off from the historic Pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Centre.[/caption] The Falcon 9 Heavy lifting off from the historic Pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Centre.“While we had hoped to bring the booster back intact, the safety of our team always takes precedence. We do not expect future missions to be impacted,” SpaceX **told** The Verge. The launch on 11 April was the **first commercial launch of the Falcon Heavy** , but the second time the Falcon Heavy was launched since it was developed. The rocket’s central booster is a modified version of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 booster, flanked by two other Falcon 9 boosters in the flight-ready Falcon Heavy rocket.

Falcon Heavy’s side boosters land on Landing Zones 1 and 2 pic.twitter.com/nJCCaVHOeo

— SpaceX (@SpaceX) April 12, 2019

Falcon Heavy’s side boosters land on Landing Zones 1 and 2 pic.twitter.com/nJCCaVHOeo— SpaceX (@SpaceX) April 12, 2019After liftoff, all three of the rocket’s boosters successfully landed on their respective landing pads — the two side-boosters at the twin pads at Cape Canaveral, and the core booster out at sea on the Of Course I Still Love You! droneship. But the core booster saw that success last only momentarily. SpaceX has efficient robots designed to recover its Falcon 9 boosters — the “octagrabber” — but the core booster had a different configuration that doesn’t latch on to the base of any booster except the Falcon 9’s (for now).

Thanks for bringing up the #Octograbber ! Perhaps this expensive incident will clarify the value of the presumably remote controlled #Octagrabber as it might save a $50M+ booster in high seas! pic.twitter.com/YOkFxSiheF

— T. Reid Lewis (@reidlewis) April 15, 2019

More from science

Careless Whispers: Scientists discover that plants can 'talk' to each other using smells Life on Mars? European Space Agency’s Orbiter discovers ice water deposits at equator

It still fared better than the Heavy’s first landing attempt in February 2018, when the outer cores made a perfect landing, but the centre core missed the drone ship by a big margin, slamming into the ocean in rather dramatic fashion.