Firstpost
  • Home
  • Video Shows
    Vantage Firstpost America Firstpost Africa First Sports
  • World
    US News
  • Explainers
  • News
    India Opinion Cricket Tech Entertainment Sports Health Photostories
  • Asia Cup 2025
Apple Incorporated Modi ji Justin Trudeau Trending

Sections

  • Home
  • Live TV
  • Videos
  • Shows
  • World
  • India
  • Explainers
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Cricket
  • Health
  • Tech/Auto
  • Entertainment
  • Web Stories
  • Business
  • Impact Shorts

Shows

  • Vantage
  • Firstpost America
  • Firstpost Africa
  • First Sports
  • Fast and Factual
  • Between The Lines
  • Flashback
  • Live TV

Events

  • Raisina Dialogue
  • Independence Day
  • Champions Trophy
  • Delhi Elections 2025
  • Budget 2025
  • US Elections 2024
  • Firstpost Defence Summit
Trending:
  • Nepal protests
  • Nepal Protests Live
  • Vice-presidential elections
  • iPhone 17
  • IND vs PAK cricket
  • Israel-Hamas war
fp-logo
Self-regulatory online content code may not serve interests of Indian consumers, creators
Whatsapp Facebook Twitter
Whatsapp Facebook Twitter
Apple Incorporated Modi ji Justin Trudeau Trending

Sections

  • Home
  • Live TV
  • Videos
  • Shows
  • World
  • India
  • Explainers
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Cricket
  • Health
  • Tech/Auto
  • Entertainment
  • Web Stories
  • Business
  • Impact Shorts

Shows

  • Vantage
  • Firstpost America
  • Firstpost Africa
  • First Sports
  • Fast and Factual
  • Between The Lines
  • Flashback
  • Live TV

Events

  • Raisina Dialogue
  • Independence Day
  • Champions Trophy
  • Delhi Elections 2025
  • Budget 2025
  • US Elections 2024
  • Firstpost Defence Summit
  • Home
  • Tech
  • News & Analysis
  • Self-regulatory online content code may not serve interests of Indian consumers, creators

Self-regulatory online content code may not serve interests of Indian consumers, creators

Sohini Chatterjee • February 4, 2019, 12:09:59 IST
Whatsapp Facebook Twitter

Signatories of this self-regulatory code include major players like Netflix, Hotstar and Jio.

Advertisement
Subscribe Join Us
Add as a preferred source on Google
Prefer
Firstpost
On
Google
Self-regulatory online content code may not serve interests of Indian consumers, creators

The Internet and Mobile Association of India’s ( **IAMAI** ) move of codifying industry best practices for online curated content (OCC) providers has caused ripples. Signatories of the code include major players like Netflix , Hotstar and Jio . The central feature of the text is its assertion as a self-regulatory code. Signatories are expected to act in good faith in putting up responsible content online. As part of this, the platforms must ensure that the content offered by them is consistent with the principles of self-regulation contained in the code. There is an assumption that the code is free speech respecting. Despite its self-regulatory character and the purported legitimacy pinned to it, the code may contain false promise for consumers and creators of online curated content in India. [caption id=“attachment_5402441” align=“alignnone” width=“1024”]Representational image. Representational image.[/caption]

State involvement

The code is not without advantages. Both the arguments in favour of self-regulation, expertise and efficiency, could stand vindicated here. As it has been jointly drafted by a group of prominent OCC providers, it may be informed by relevant expertise and technical knowledge about the digital content industry. Further, the voluntary nature of the code may produce control more efficiently than government regulation by presenting lower costs relating to information, compliance and enforcement. However, there is an underlying assumption that the code is sans State involvement. This merits scrutiny. It is worth noting that the raison d’être of the code is the fear of the State’s censorship impulse. In other words, it is a pre-emptive reaction to the threat that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B Ministry) may be contemplating an online content law. Commenters have noted that video streaming services are not a policy priority for the government at present. The need for such a code to be introduced at this time is thus unclear. Having said that, there have been at least two web-series related PILs filed in the Delhi High Court and the Bombay High Court seeking the removal of objectionable content from the shows **Sacred Games** and Gandi Baat. This may have led the OCC providers to anticipate a real threat of impending State action, with the government being prodded by the courts about its measures to regulate online content. In order to avert this possibility, the OCC providers went ahead with a self-regulatory model. [caption id=“attachment_5793981” align=“alignnone” width=“1280”]A man rides his scooter past a hoardings of Netflix’s new television series Representational image.[/caption] It is likely that the code will operate within a State-sanctioned framework. It allows for the I&B Ministry and the **Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology** (MeitY) to receive and forward complaints to the department of an OCC provider. The code may also receive official endorsement by the I&B Ministry. These channels provide room for further State influence.

Self-regulation and censorship

The code and the support for it is premised on a superficially stark contrast between self-regulation on one hand, and censorship by the State on the other. This is a blunt distinction for two reasons.

First, self-regulation is not a monolith at the opposite end of State regulation. A host of arrangements across the spectrum can be described as self-regulatory. The strategy may constitute merely an element in a broader regulatory agenda. Depending on how much state sanction accrues to the code, it can vary in its degree of self-regulation.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Second, the code has precariously combined some drawbacks of both State regulation and self-regulation. While pre-empting censorship imposed by the government, the code itself has engaged in private pre-censorship. It has prohibited categories of content which “deliberately and maliciously” disrespect the national emblem or flag, outrage religious sentiments, or encourage terrorism and violence against the State. The vague form and subjectivity inherent in the conditions make them red flags for free speech.

More from News & Analysis
What is the US HIRE Bill and why is India’s $250-billion IT sector worried? What is the US HIRE Bill and why is India’s $250-billion IT sector worried? Is the internet dead? What's this theory that OpenAI's Sam Altman says might be true? Is the internet dead? What's this theory that OpenAI's Sam Altman says might be true?

[caption id=“attachment_4445823” align=“alignnone” width=“1280”]Representational image. Image: Reuters Representational image. Image: Reuters[/caption]

Its classification scheme for helping the consumer to determine age appropriate and sensitive content appears less intrusive. Even then, such categorisations, content descriptors and technological tools may be paternalistic. Overt intrusion into the choice of consumers should not be made in the garb of providing better information.

The code also exposes the shortcomings of self-regulation. It has been drawn up and collated by a group of private companies that lack democratic legitimacy and accountability.

Considering that there is no targeted law to censor online video content in India, it is hard to justify the widespread public effects the code will have in curbing the free speech rights of creators (freedom to impart ideas) and consumers (freedom to receive ideas).

Additionally, the existence of this code does not bar the formulation of alternate codes by another OCC provider, not party to it, or a group of such providers. The presence of multiple codes may lead to inconsistent norms prevailing in the industry on what constitutes responsible content. This may lead to confusion on what the prevalent standard is, and encourage OCC providers to err on the side of caution by censoring deeper.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

The code does not appear to serve the interests of either Indian consumers or creators. There is enough cause to rethink the endeavour.

The author is a Research Fellow in public law at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.

Disclosure: Firstpost is part of Network18 Media & Investment Limited which is owned by Reliance Industries Limited that also owns Reliance Jio

Tags
Censorship Netflix Free Speech online Video streaming Internet and Mobile Association of India IAMAI jio Hotstar Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology TechFeature self regulatory code online curated content OCC
End of Article
Latest News
Find us on YouTube
Subscribe
End of Article

Top Stories

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Top Shows

Vantage Firstpost America Firstpost Africa First Sports
Latest News About Firstpost
Most Searched Categories
  • Web Stories
  • World
  • India
  • Explainers
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Cricket
  • Tech/Auto
  • Entertainment
  • IPL 2025
NETWORK18 SITES
  • News18
  • Money Control
  • CNBC TV18
  • Forbes India
  • Advertise with us
  • Sitemap
Firstpost Logo

is on YouTube

Subscribe Now

Copyright @ 2024. Firstpost - All Rights Reserved

About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms Of Use
Home Video Shorts Live TV