 "Google does a U-turn on plan to get rid of cookies from Chrome")
Google has reversed its decision to eliminate cookies from its Chrome web browser, ending a four-year effort aimed at enhancing user privacy. This sudden change comes after significant pushback from advertisers and regulators.
On Monday, Google announced a “new path for privacy,” allowing users to choose whether to enable or disable cookies, but ultimately retaining them within Chrome. This marks a shift from Google’s 2020 promise to phase out all cross-website cookies within two years, similar to Apple’s approach of blocking third-party tracking by default in its Safari browser.
Cookies, which are small text files placed in users’ browsers to track online behavior, are crucial for online advertisers to monitor users across various websites and target them with personalized ads. The initial plan to eliminate cookies faced opposition from the digital advertising, ad tech, and publishing industries. They argued that this move would damage their business models, give Google an even greater advantage in consumer data collection, and compel them to pay more for Google’s ad-targeting services.
The project experienced delays and in 2021, UK regulators launched an investigation into whether Google’s plans were anti-competitive. Although Google eventually alleviated the UK competition authority’s concerns, its first attempt to replace cookies, known as “Floc,” was abandoned due to privacy concerns. The timeline was extended again in 2022 to give advertisers more time to adapt to the changes.
Despite Google’s continued efforts and a February statement indicating it had begun to remove some cookies with plans to phase out all third-party cookies by the end of the year, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) raised issues with the proposed replacement technologies, describing them as “deeply flawed.” This contributed to Google’s decision to cancel the plan.
Impact Shorts
More ShortsGoogle’s Anthony Chavez, head of the Privacy Sandbox project, acknowledged that this transition involves significant work and affects publishers, advertisers, and everyone in online advertising. He emphasized that the updated approach prioritizes user choice and that Google is engaging with regulators and the industry to implement this new strategy.
ICO deputy commissioner Stephen Bonner expressed disappointment over Google’s reversal, noting that blocking third-party cookies would have been beneficial for consumers. He urged the digital advertising industry to adopt more private alternatives to third-party cookies and warned against using more opaque tracking methods. The ICO will monitor industry responses and consider regulatory action for any systemic non-compliance, including against Google.
The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is evaluating the impact of Google’s announcement and is inviting feedback until August 12.
This decision highlights the ongoing tension between enhancing user privacy and maintaining the business models of online advertisers. As Google navigates these challenges, the industry continues to seek a balance that protects user data while supporting the needs of digital advertising.
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
