 "Representative image. Reuters")
The US Labour Department has postponed investigations into Apple’s treatment of its employees after US President Donald Trump appointed a lawyer from a management-side law firm to lead the agency. Labour advocates have criticised the move, arguing that it represents a reversal of worker protections under the current administration.
The National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) acknowledged that it has halted investigations into Apple’s alleged suppression of unionisation attempts. The claims include allegations that Apple intimidated and retaliated against employees who attempted to organise.
The agency’s decision follows Trump’s appointment of John Ring, a veteran attorney at a law firm renowned for supporting corporate interests, as its new chairman.
Labour organisations are concerned that the decision signals a pro-business shift at the NLRB. “This is a clear indication that the board under Trump is prioritising corporate interests over workers’ rights,” said a spokesperson from a prominent labour organisation. “It sends a chilling message to employees who want to exercise their rights.”
Apple’s labour policies have come under increased scrutiny in recent years. The corporation has denied any misconduct, stating that it respects workers’ rights and complies with labour laws.
However, many employees have claimed that Apple has employed anti-union tactics, such as compulsory meetings to discourage union participation and disciplinary action against organisers.
The suspension of investigations raises concerns about the future of labour enforcement under the Trump administration. According to some analysts, the move may encourage other firms to adopt a more aggressive stance against unionisation efforts.
Impact Shorts
More Shorts“This decision could have a ripple effect across industries,” warned a labour law professor. “Employers may feel less pressure to comply with labour regulations if they believe enforcement is weakening.”
Despite the setback, labour organisations vow to continue advocating for worker protections. “We’re not going to stop fighting,” said one union representative. “If the NLRB won’t act, we’ll explore other legal avenues to hold corporations accountable.”
The situation remains fluid, and it is uncertain whether the NLRB will resume its investigation into Apple in the future. Meanwhile, labour organisers are urging politicians to ensure that workers’ rights are upheld.