World Cup champion US women's football team pushed on equal pay: Could they beat German men?
Lawyers for the US Soccer Federation are trying to show it's OK to pay the women differently than the men because the competition is different. The sides made excerpts of depositions public in court filings.
US women's football team are seeking more than $66 million in damages after alleging the USSF violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963
The federation maintains the women have many benefits the men lack, including guaranteed salaries, health insurance, paid child-care assistance, pregnancy and parental leave, severance pay and access to a retirement plan
USSF said that from fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2019, the women's national team had gross revenue of $101.3 million for 238 games, an average of $425,446, and the men grossed $185.7 million for 191 matches, an average of $972,147
Carli Lloyd was pushed over and over on differences between women and men. "Do you think the women's national team could beat the German men's team?" US Soccer Federation lawyer Noah Finkel asked during a 20 December deposition.
"I'm not sure," the two-time FIFA Player of the Year replied.
Finkel inquired about a 2015 email interview Lloyd conducted through her agent's assistant with the website Sportskeeda.
"You wrote men are faster and stronger, right?" Finkel probed.
"Yeah, if you take those away, yeah, it would be a contest," Lloyd said.
Again and again, members of the champion US women's team were pushed to detail distinctions between their sport, which they dominate, and the men's game, where the Americans struggle.
Lawyers for the USSF are trying to show it's OK to pay the women differently than the men because the competition is different. The sides made excerpts of depositions public in court filings Thursday night.
"The tone during depositions is reflective of the kind of condescension that many USSF officials employ when talking to the players about pay and workplace conditions," said Molly Levinson, spokeswoman for the players, "including the plainly disrespectful and sexist attitudes from USSF and their representatives during CBA negotiations when they refused to offer anything close to equal pay."
The women sued last year, alleging the USSF violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963 in reaching what they say is an inferior collective bargaining agreement with the women than the deal struck with the American men. They are seeking more than $66 million in damages.
The federation maintains the women have many benefits the men lack, including guaranteed salaries, health insurance, paid child-care assistance, pregnancy and parental leave, severance pay and access to a 401(k) retirement plan. Men get paid by the game and tournament, most earning the majority of their income from their club.
Reigning FIFA Player of the Year Megan Rapinoe was questioned about her response in an interview she gave to Pod Save America in which she said: "Our pay structure is different. We play different games. We're different rankings in the world. Like, it's just apples to oranges."
The USSF said that from fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2019, the women's national team had gross revenue of $101.3 million for 238 games, an average of $425,446, and the men grossed $185.7 million for 191 matches, an average of $972,147. The women had a $27.6 million net loss over 11 years and the men lost $3.13 million.
"The international soccer environment in which the MNT players compete is far more competitive by many measures than that in which plaintiffs compete," the USSF said in one of its papers filed with the court. "The MNT players have lower odds of succeeding in the face of such greater competition. In short, MNT players must achieve more and/or better results against tougher competition in order to qualify for, and succeed in, tournament competition."
Barring a settlement, the trial is scheduled to start 5 May in US District Court in Los Angeles. The women's five-year labor deal runs through 2021 while the men play under the terms of a contract that expired 31 December.
During her deposition on 15 January, former US coach Jill Ellis testified she was told the men got chartered flights at times and the women didn't. The USSF spent about $10.7 million on hotels for the men and approximately $7.3 million on the women during the fiscal years 2012-20. Air travel was about $6.3 million for the women during that period and $14.3 million for the men, many of whom play in Europe. The USSF increased first- and business-class travel for the women in 2017.
Speaking during her 20 December deposition, Lloyd talked about personally training with the Medford Strikers' under-18 boys team in New Jersey.
"It's different in the sense that men are bigger, stronger, faster. That's their makeup. There's no -- there's no denying science in that regard," she said. "But I am the most skillful player there. So if you take their speed and athleticism and their strength away, it's the same game."
Former USSF President Sunil Gulati during a 17 December deposition used a comparison with an NBA star to point out differences.
"LeBron James doesn't get a bonus for getting 15 points and for the Lakers finishing out of the playoffs," he said. "The expectations for him are different based on who they're playing against, what — who he is, what the level is."
FIFA Women's World Cup 2019: US Soccer Federation and national team agree to mediation for gender discrimination lawsuit
The US Soccer Federation has reached a tentative agreement for mediation with the women’s national team to resolve complaints in a lawsuit over equal pay with the men’s team, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.
US women's football team files discrimination lawsuit against national federation demanding equal pay
The US women's national team filed a discrimination lawsuit against the Soccer Federation, just three months before defending their World Cup title.
US men’s national team on Wednesday called on the US Soccer Federation to at least triple the pay of women’s national team players and accused the federation of “working very hard to sell a false narrative” in opposing their quest for higher pay