US women's football asked to wait until 2021 for jury trial on their charges of discriminatory working conditions

Los Angeles: If American women’s football players want a jury trial on their claim of discriminatory working conditions, they must wait until next year. US District Judge R. Gary Klausner told the players and the US Soccer Federation on Wednesday that jurors were not available during the novel coronavirus pandemic. He informed the sides if they wanted to stick with their 15 September trial date, they would have to agree by 6 August to a bench trial in which he would decide the verdict. If they want a jury trial, he would postpone the start until 26 January. [caption id=“attachment_8655391” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] US Women’s football team line up ahead of their match. Reuters/File [/caption] “The players are confident that they will prevail at trial and are considering the options presented by the court for proceeding," players’ spokeswoman Molly Levinson said in a statement. Players sued in March 2019 under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and they sought more than $66 million in damages. Klausner ruled on 1 May that the women could not prove discrimination over pay and granted in part the USSF’s motion for a partial summary judgment. He said the union for the women’s national team rejected an offer to be paid under the same pay-to-play structure as the men’s national team’s collective bargaining agreement and the women accepted guaranteed salaries and greater benefits along with a different bonus structure. He also refused to let go to trial allegations the women were discriminated against because they played more games on artificial turf. Klausner left intact claims the USSF discriminated in its use of charter aircraft, and in the money it spent on commercial airfare, hotel accommodations, and medical and training support services.