Liverpool want bigger share of overseas TV money

London: Liverpool want a larger share of the overseas TV rights money currently negotiated collectively by the Premier League on behalf of the clubs and have raised the prospect of negotiating their own deal, British media reported on Wednesday. Liverpool managing director Ian Ayre was quoted in The Guardian saying the break-up of the established broadcasting deal for English top flight clubs is “a debate that has to happen” with the Anfield club favouring the Spanish model. The 1.4 billion pounds international rights deal covering the 2010-13 period is shared equally between all the Premier League clubs. In Spain, Barcelona and Real Madrid negotiate their own individual TV contracts. The Guardian said Ayre believes the Premier League’s four biggest global draws – Liverpool, Manchester United, Chelsea and Arsenal – deserve an increased share of overseas TV revenue from 2013 to match their global popularity. [caption id=“attachment_105682” align=“alignleft” width=“380” caption=“Liverpool want a bigger share of the overseas TV money. Getty Images”]  [/caption] “Personally I think the game-changer is going out and recognising our brand globally,” said Ayre. “Maybe the path will be individual TV rights like they do in Spain. There are so many things moving in that particular area. “What is absolutely certain is that, with the greatest of respect to our colleagues in the Premier League, but if you’re a Bolton fan in Bolton, then you subscribe to Sky because you want to watch Bolton. Everyone gets that. Likewise, if you’re a Liverpool fan from Liverpool, you subscribe. “But if you’re in Kuala Lumpur there isn’t anyone subscribing to Astro, or ESPN to watch Bolton, or if they are it’s a very small number. Whereas the large majority are subscribing because they want to watch Liverpool, Manchester United, Chelsea or Arsenal. “So is it right that the international rights are shared equally between all the clubs?” added Ayre whose club, along with all the others in the Premier league, last season received 17.9 million pounds each from the overseas TV deal. THE REVENUE “Some people will say: ‘Well you’ve got to all be in it to make it happen.’ But isn’t it really about where the revenue is coming from, which is the broadcaster, and isn’t it really about who people want to watch on that channel? “We know it is us. And others. At some point we definitely feel there has to be some rebalance on that, because what we are actually doing is disadvantaging ourselves against other big European clubs,” Ayre was quoted as saying. “If Real Madrid or Barcelona or other big European clubs have the opportunity to truly realise their international media value potential, where does that leave Liverpool and Manchester United?” he added. “We’ll just share ours because we’ll all be nice to each other? The whole phenomenon of the Premier League could be threatened. “If they just get bigger and bigger and they generate more and more, then all the players will start drifting that way and will the Premier League bubble burst because we are sticking to this equal-sharing model? It’s a real debate that has to happen. Any change to the current collective TV arrangement – the so-called Founder Members’ Agreement – would require a proposal to be put before the Premier League and 14 of the 20 clubs voting in favour of a new commercial arrangement. Liverpool plan to raise the issue at the next Premier League meeting, British media reported. Reuters