Caster Semenya vs IAAF: CAS rules against South African, says 'discrimination is necessary' for integrity of female athletics

Lausanne: South African runner Caster Semenya on Wednesday lost her court challenge against IAAF rules forcing female athletes to regulate their testosterone levels, but judges voiced concern with the application of the “discriminatory” regulations. Semenya, a double Olympic champion, was fighting measures imposed by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) that compel “hyperandrogenic” athletes — or those with “differences of sexual development” (DSD) — to lower their testosterone levels if they wish to compete as women. A three-judge panel at the Court of Arbitration for Sport said even though the rules are “discriminatory…such discrimination is a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of achieving the IAAF’s aim of preserving the integrity of female athletics in the Restricted Events.”

🤷‍♂️ pic.twitter.com/FHmm10npfx

— Caster Semenya (@MightyCaster) May 1, 2019

But the three-judge-panel voiced “serious concerns” about the viability of rules moving forward. The IAAF said it was “grateful” for the CAS ruling and that the rules — first adopted last year but suspended pending the legal battle — will come into effect on 8 May. “Sometimes it’s better to react with no reaction,” Semenya said on Twitter after the verdict was announced. But her advocates — which include a global coalition of nations, scientific experts and human rights defenders — are certain to be less restrained. Fairness The IAAF insisted the rules were essential to preserve a level playing field and ensure that all female athletes can see “a path to success”. The governing body has stressed that DSD athletes with male levels of testosterone benefit from increased bone and muscle size in a manner similar to males who have gone through puberty. Although they rejected Semenya’s appeal, the judges urged the IAAF to treat their DSD regulations as a “living document,” which could be continually revised as they are applied and new information about their impact becomes clear. Experts have argued that achieving excellence in sport is a combination of training and commitment as well as genetics and that barring people from competition over a single genetic factor has no scientific basis. In a rare intrusion into the world of sport, the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted a resolution in March branding the IAAF rules “unnecessary, humiliating and harmful”. Seema Patel, a senior lecturer in law at Nottingham Law School, called the CAS ruling “bitterly disappointing.” “A female who has naturally higher levels of testosterone in her body should not be prohibited from competing with women, just as a female who is naturally taller than the average woman should not be prohibited,” Patel said in a statement. Patel also questioned whether a sports court had the competence to deal with “human rights matters.” Semenya’s testosterone levels are not publicly known, but she is unlikely to be the only athlete affected by rules compelling female runners in certain categories to cap their testosterone levels at five nanomoles per litre (nmol/L) of blood. The two athletes who finished behind her in the Rio Olympics 800m, Francine Niyonsaba of Burundi and Kenya’s Margaret Wambui, have also faced questions about their testosterone levels. Semenya has 30 days to appeal, in a challenge that would be heard by the Swiss Federal Tribunal. Read Firstpost's detailed explainer about how the Caster Semenya case against the IAAF on hyperandrogenism will have wider ramifications in athletics, here What's IAAF's rationale behind the controversial hyperandrogenism rules and why are some runners backing it? Why are IAAF's critics claiming its hyperandrogenism rules are racist and unfair?