Supreme Court criticises defence ministry for not replying to CBI's letters on 'extra-judicial killings' in Manipur

The Supreme Court has expressed its displeasure over the Ministry of Defence not responding to letters by the CBI on 'extra-judicial killings' in Manipur.

PTI May 19, 2018 17:35:16 IST
Supreme Court criticises defence ministry for not replying to CBI's letters on 'extra-judicial killings' in Manipur

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has expressed its displeasure that the Ministry of Defence has "not even bothered" to respond to the letters addressed to it by the CBI's Special Investigation Team (SIT) that is probing the alleged extra-judicial killings and fake encounters by the Army, Assam Rifles and police in Manipur.

A bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and UU Lalit asked the SIT to conclude by 30 June its investigations in the cases related to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), judicial inquiries and those on which the Gauhati High Court had given its findings.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Maninder Singh, appearing for the CBI, told the bench that he would take up the matter with the Ministry of Defence to ensure necessary co-operation.

"We have also seen from status report no. five (filed by the SIT) that letters have been addressed by the SIT to the Ministry of Defence in some cases as far back as in February 2018, but the Ministry of Defence has not even bothered to respond to those letters," the bench noted in its order.

"The ASG says he will take it up with the Ministry of Defence and ensure that necessary co-operation is extended and letters will be responded with promptitude. We expect the Ministry of Defence to fully cooperate with the SIT," the court said and listed the matter for hearing on 2 July.

Supreme Court criticises defence ministry for not replying to CBIs letters on extrajudicial killings in Manipur

File image of Supreme Court. AP

Singh told the court that the SIT would give a list of documents to the chief secretary and director general of police (DGP) of Manipur to ensure that all the materials were made available to the probe team or at least, an explanation on which documents were not available and why was given.

"We would require this to be done in a time-bound manner," the bench observed, while noting that in the status report filed by the SIT, there were several entries concerning non-supply of documents by the police and other agencies.

The apex court directed the in-charge of the SIT, Sharad Aggarwal, to furnish the list within a week and said it expected that the chief secretary and DGP of the northeastern state would respond to it "positively within three weeks".

"On the basis of the material on record i.e. the report of the CFSL (Central Forensic Sciences Laboratory) and documents and statements of witnesses, we expect the SIT to conclude the investigations by 30 June, 2018 in respect of cases pertaining to Table II (judicial inquiry and high court cases) and III (NHRC) and file the final report under Section 173, CrPC," the court said.
As many as 31 FIRs have been lodged by the SIT under the category of cases in Tables II and III.

During the hearing, the CFSL director assured the court that the reconstruction of the crime scene would be done expeditiously and he would ensure that the tasks pending with the department were completed at the earliest.

The apex court had earlier directed the SIT to expedite its probe into the alleged fake encounters, which had come under the scanner of the NHRC, the Gauhati High Court and some commissions of inquiry.

The court had, on 12 February, expressed its displeasure over the progress of the SIT probe in these cases and observed that something was "terribly wrong".

The court, which is hearing a PIL seeking a probe into as many as 1,528 cases of alleged extra-judicial killings in Manipur, had on 14 July last year set up the SIT and ordered registration of FIRs and a probe into the alleged extra-judicial killings in the northeastern state.

Updated Date:

also read

Abetment involves mental process of 'instigating a person' in doing something, declares Supreme Court
India

Abetment involves mental process of 'instigating a person' in doing something, declares Supreme Court

"Abetment involves the mental process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding a person in doing a thing," said bench comprising Justices R Subhash Reddy and Hrishikesh Roy.

Dhanbad judge deliberately hit by autorickshaw driver, CBI tells Jharkhand High Court
India

Dhanbad judge deliberately hit by autorickshaw driver, CBI tells Jharkhand High Court

The 49-year-old judge died after a three-wheeler knocked him down while he was out for his morning jog. The video of the incident soon went viral on social media

NHRC seeks action taken report from Assam DGP on fake encounters within a month
India

NHRC seeks action taken report from Assam DGP on fake encounters within a month

The Commission, in an email sent to the DGP, also sought to know if he has received any notice, order, etc. on the same issue from the state human rights commission