Firstpost
  • Home
  • Video Shows
    Vantage Firstpost America Firstpost Africa First Sports
  • World
    US News
  • Explainers
  • News
    India Opinion Cricket Tech Entertainment Sports Health Photostories
  • Asia Cup 2025
Apple Incorporated Modi ji Justin Trudeau Trending

Sections

  • Home
  • Live TV
  • Videos
  • Shows
  • World
  • India
  • Explainers
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Cricket
  • Health
  • Tech/Auto
  • Entertainment
  • Web Stories
  • Business
  • Impact Shorts

Shows

  • Vantage
  • Firstpost America
  • Firstpost Africa
  • First Sports
  • Fast and Factual
  • Between The Lines
  • Flashback
  • Live TV

Events

  • Raisina Dialogue
  • Independence Day
  • Champions Trophy
  • Delhi Elections 2025
  • Budget 2025
  • US Elections 2024
  • Firstpost Defence Summit
Trending:
  • Nepal protests
  • Nepal Protests Live
  • Vice-presidential elections
  • iPhone 17
  • IND vs PAK cricket
  • Israel-Hamas war
fp-logo
SC's demand for apology, arrest of BJP worker shows how Section 66A of IT Act continues to haunt free speech despite being struck down
Whatsapp Facebook Twitter
Whatsapp Facebook Twitter
Apple Incorporated Modi ji Justin Trudeau Trending

Sections

  • Home
  • Live TV
  • Videos
  • Shows
  • World
  • India
  • Explainers
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Cricket
  • Health
  • Tech/Auto
  • Entertainment
  • Web Stories
  • Business
  • Impact Shorts

Shows

  • Vantage
  • Firstpost America
  • Firstpost Africa
  • First Sports
  • Fast and Factual
  • Between The Lines
  • Flashback
  • Live TV

Events

  • Raisina Dialogue
  • Independence Day
  • Champions Trophy
  • Delhi Elections 2025
  • Budget 2025
  • US Elections 2024
  • Firstpost Defence Summit
  • Home
  • Politics
  • SC's demand for apology, arrest of BJP worker shows how Section 66A of IT Act continues to haunt free speech despite being struck down

SC's demand for apology, arrest of BJP worker shows how Section 66A of IT Act continues to haunt free speech despite being struck down

Shishir Tripathi • May 14, 2019, 22:04:53 IST
Whatsapp Facebook Twitter

While Priyanka Sharma has been released and the Supreme Court waived the condition of apology, the fact that she was asked to apologise in the first place raises the question if Section 66A is still in existence

Advertisement
Subscribe Join Us
Add as a preferred source on Google
Prefer
Firstpost
On
Google
SC's demand for apology, arrest of BJP worker shows how Section 66A of IT Act continues to haunt free speech despite being struck down

On 17 November, 2012, two young women in a Facebook post criticised the complete shutdown that was observed in Mumbai following the death of Shiv Sena founder and chief Bal Thackeray. Shaheen Dhada wrote the original post and Renu Srinivasan commented on it criticising the shutdown. Dhada wrote, “Every day thousands of people die. But still the world moves on… Just due to one politician dead. A natural death. Everyone goes crazy… Respect is earned not given out, definitely not forced. Today Mumbai shuts down due to fear not due to respect." Srinivasan commented, “Everyone knows it’s done because of fear!!! We agree that he has done a lot of good things also, we respect him; it doesn’t make sense to shut down everything! Respect can be shown in many other ways!” These two viewpoints shared by two young women were enough for the police to invoke Section 66A of the IT Act — that gave police the power to arrest anyone for communicating any message that is “grossly offensive or has menacing character” through any electronic communication channel. [caption id=“attachment_6631321” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]BJP worker Priyanka Sharma was arrested under Section 66A of the IT Act for sharing a meme of Mamata Banerjee. ANI BJP worker Priyanka Sharma was arrested under Section 66A of the IT Act for sharing a meme of Mamata Banerjee. ANI[/caption] The arrest was vehemently criticised and around 10 petitions were filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A of the IT Act. Among them, one was filed by Shreya Singhal, a young law student from Delhi. On 24 March, 2015, in a landmark judgment a bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton F Nariman struck down Section 66A of IT Act. Differentiating between ‘discussion, advocacy and incitement’, the bench held that “mere discussion or even advocacy of a particular cause, howsoever unpopular, is at heart of Article (19) (1) (a) (all citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression)”. It added, “Only when such discussion or advocacy reaches the level of incitement that Article 19 (2) (it allows the state to make laws imposing reasonable restriction of freedom of speech and expression) kicks in.” In January 2019, four years after the 2015 SC judgment struck down Section 66A of IT Act, in a petition filed by People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), the Supreme Court issued a notice to the central government to take measures to stop the continued use of Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000, as the provision was struck down in Shreya Singhal versus Union of India judgment. According to PUCL, 22 people were booked under Section 66A even after it was scrapped by the Supreme Court in 2015. As reported by The Hindu, “the bench led by Justice Nariman, who wrote the judgment in March 2015 upholding online free speech against Section 66A, said ‘strict action’ would follow if the claims in the petition filed by PUCL were found true”. Now, in yet another case of blatant misuse of Section 66 A of the IT Act, West Bengal Police arrested an activist of BJP’s youth wing on 10 May. Priyanka Sharma was arrested for sharing a morphed photo of West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee on Facebook and was sent to judicial custody. Sharma was booked under Section 66A apart from Section 500 of the IPC and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act. Here, the most important questions that arise are: in which manner does Sharma’s post — a morphed picture of a leader — can amount to “incitement” and defamation, and for what reason was the Section 67A of IT Act invoked, which reads “punishment for publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act, etc, in electronic form"? Following her arrest, Sharma moved the Supreme Court seeking relief. On Tuesday, while hearing her plea seeking bail and challenging the arrest, the bench of Justices Indira Banerjee and Sanjiv Khanna ordered for Sharma’s immediate release, however, they also held that while freedom of speech is “non-negotiable” it cannot be allowed to “violate”. It also criticised the meme shared by Sharma, holding that it is wrong to superimpose somebody’s face like the meme did.

FirstCutByManjul15052019

The bench while ordering Sharma’s release asked her to apologise for the same and left the larger question regarding the free speech for later. Singhal, whose petition resulted in striking down of the Section 66A commenting upon the entire episode says, “I feel it is really horrendous and it is shocking that there can be a blatant misuse of the law. It is really shocking that the woman was arrested for something, which frankly does not require arrest.” In this age of “social media” people are freely sharing their viewpoints that can be by all means offensive to someone or other. But can a punitive law like Section 66A have any positive role to play? Commenting on this Singhal, says, “Leave the social media age. This is the age of acceptance. As an Indian society, you are not expected to be so regressive that you cannot take a bad joke, that too when you are in politics. Also, the use of Section 66A also shows what kind of policing is being done. The police should know while booking someone whether the section is in existence or not. This is shocking considering that in January, the Supreme Court had clearly instructed that each and every police station in the country should be made aware of the judgment as it was still being misused.” When asked how she reacts to the stern stand taken by the Supreme Court on Tuesday as the bench criticised the meme and asked Sharma to apologise for the same, Singhal says, “I don’t know what transpired in the Supreme Court but the fact is that the Supreme Court cannot sit like a parent instructing people to say sorry and all. The post by Sharma might be satirical or something else and am not prescribing to her view. But what I would say is that the arrest was completely uncalled for and it was complete misuse of the law." While Sharma has been released, and the Supreme Court later waived the condition of apology , the fact that she was asked to apologise in the first place for her ‘indiscretion’ of mocking Mamata Banerjee through a morphed photo, raises an important question. Does this mean that Section 66A is still in existence?

Tags
Congress BJP Supreme Court West Bengal CriticalPoint Freedom of Speech TMC Free Speech Freedom of Expression Section 66A of IT Act Section 66A West Bengal police Information Technology Act 2000 IT Act 2000 shreya singhal Manjul Justice Indira Banerjee Justice Sanjiv Khanna Priyanka Sharma Mamata Banerjee meme Shreya Singhal versus Union of India
End of Article
Latest News
Find us on YouTube
Subscribe
End of Article

Top Stories

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Israel targets top Hamas leaders in Doha; Qatar, Iran condemn strike as violation of sovereignty

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Nepal: Oli to continue until new PM is sworn in, nation on edge as all branches of govt torched

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Who is CP Radhakrishnan, India's next vice-president?

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Israel informed US ahead of strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha, says White House

Top Shows

Vantage Firstpost America Firstpost Africa First Sports
Latest News About Firstpost
Most Searched Categories
  • Web Stories
  • World
  • India
  • Explainers
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Cricket
  • Tech/Auto
  • Entertainment
  • IPL 2025
NETWORK18 SITES
  • News18
  • Money Control
  • CNBC TV18
  • Forbes India
  • Advertise with us
  • Sitemap
Firstpost Logo

is on YouTube

Subscribe Now

Copyright @ 2024. Firstpost - All Rights Reserved

About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms Of Use
Home Video Shorts Live TV