Sabarimala protests: Kerala BJP chief says party 'will be with devotees when temple opens' on 5 November
When Sabarimala opens on 5 November, BJP workers 'will be in full strength' and will support the wishes of Lord Ayyappa devotees, Kerala party chief PS Sreedharan Pillai said.
Thiruvananthapuram: The BJP will continue to stand by devotees opposed to the entry of all women to the Sabarimala temple, Kerala BJP President PS Sreedharan Pillai said on Sunday.
Pillai also announced a series of protests to ensure that Sabarimala's uniqueness — keeping away women in the age group of 10 to 50 — was kept intact.
The temple closed after five days of monthly puja on 22 October. It will now open at 5 pm on 5 November and close the next day at 10 pm.
"We will be in full strength and will support the devotees' wishes when the temple opens on the 5th," Pillai told the media. "The situation in Kerala is worse than the Emergency days. People are being arrested at midnight just because they protested in a peaceful manner, fighting for the rights of the devotees of Lord Ayyappa."
An estimated 3,345 protesters who prevented women from entering the Sabarimala temple have been arrested since 26 October, while 517 cases have been registered at various police stations across Kerala.
Pillai said that across the country, there were many temples dedicated to Lord Ayyappa, but the temple at Sabarimala was unique.
He said he would stage a day-long protest outside the office of the Kerala Police chief. "A 'rath yatra' will start from a temple in Kasargode on 8 November and reach Pathanamthitta district, where the Sabarimala temple is located, on 13 November."
Senior leaders, including Modi and BJP president JP Nadda, have asked other state units to take a leaf out of the party's campaign in the western state
The decision was taken at the National Executive Meeting of the BJP here in the national capital
The Kerala government has said it is considering granting menstrual leave to women students of all state universities coming under the Department of Higher Education. The move remains hotly contested with some hailing the decision and others arguing its necessity