Reservation in India: Ramdas Athawale has a point, let's not dismiss his suggestion out of hand

Two recent events have brought up a subject the middle class does not like: Reservation.

File image of Ramdas Athawale. IBNLive

File image of Ramdas Athawale. IBNLive

Union minister Ramdas Athawale has asked for reservation in cricket, saying that the Indian team has a poor record. If it were to include more communities, Athawale says, it could perform better. Before we look at the issue, let's look at the data. Is Athawale right in saying that India's national team loses more than it wins? The answer is: Yes.

In test cricket, India has a losing record against Australia (lost 41, won 26), England (lost 43, won 25), Pakistan (lost 12, won 9), West Indies (lost 30, won 18) and South Africa (lost 13, won 10). We have winning records against Bangladesh, New Zealand, Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka. The record in one day internationals is not very different. We have a losing record against Australia (lost 72, won 41), Pakistan (lost 73, won 52), West Indies (lost 61, won 56) and South Africa (lost 45, won 29). Of all the major teams, against only England (lost 39, won 52) have we been able to win more than lose. Clearly Athawale is right.

We are 130 crore people (our population is more than twice as much as all other cricketing nations put together). If this is our merit-based record, then it is not out of place to look at ways of improving it. We should be open to looking at Athawale's suggestion of reservation. India will not be unique if it chooses to do this.

Last year, South Africa put in place racial quotas for teams across all formats of the game. The playing 11 must have six players of colour, of whom at least two must be black African. Meaning that players of Indian or subcontinental origin like Hashim Amla and Imran Tahir can be included in the six but not the two. Why did they do this? Because black Africans are 80 percent of the population but don't have fair representation. Whites are 10 percent but have always dominated the team as Indians who follow cricket will know. The reason is that access to sporting facilities, training and coaching at the highest level was only for whites during their decades of Apartheid. Even Indians, who are only 2 percent of the South African population, get good representation in the team and so it was necessary that there be a quota for blacks.

Has this quota affected the team's performance? No. Countries around the world will testify to the fact that they remain one of the most difficult sides to beat. But the real benefit to the South African side will come in the decades ahead. Young black Africans will find role models and be drawn to the sport of cricket. This will broaden the talent pool that is available and the national side will benefit as millions more play a game that previously only the elite played.

In India, the Dalits and Adivasis make up 25 percent of the population. However, their representation is close to zero. It is easy to think of the Indian squad's Brahmin players from around the country (Gavaskar, Tendulkar, Dravid, Ganguly, Srinath, Kumble). But it is difficult to come up with names of those from marginalised communities, Dalits and Adivasis, who have played for India. Athawale has asked for 25% reservation but even if that number is unacceptable for whatever reason, we should think about the issue and discuss and debate it rather than dismissing it out of hand.

The second story about reservation is in politics. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) nominated a Dalit to be President of India. This is a smart and wise move and will ensure that the nominee, former governor Ram Nath Kovind, will get elected with plenty of bipartisan support. Kovind is not from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and is a relatively recent member of the BJP (he joined the party in his 40s).

He represents the uneasy relationship the RSS and the BJP have with Dalits. The BJP's Dalit MPs like Udit Raj can testify. Instinctively, the Hindutva party is against reservation and inclusion. We can see this from the list of RSS sarsanghachalaks (Hegdewar, Paranjape, Golwalkar, Deoras, Sudarshan and current chief Bhagwat). All of them are Brahmin. Only one RSS chief has been non-Brahmin, Rajendra Singh, also from an upper caste. It should be said that it is easier for Hindutva to make a Dalit the President of India than the head of the RSS.

The common defence of the RSS against this accusation is that: "We don't ask about caste and we don't notice it". This is what corporate India will also say when asked how inclusive it is. That's the same thing the Indian team will also say. But it hides the reality of discrimination and exclusion.

Inclusion and diversity in the long run will help the cricket team and the country. To those who say that our record will be blemished by this action, I will point out the data and say we are not a particularly good team against strong sides in any case. We should not use that as an excuse and should seriously consider what Athawale says.

Updated Date: Jul 09, 2017 08:31 AM

Also Watch

Social Media Star: Abhishek Bachchan, Varun Grover reveal how they handle selfies, trolls and broccoli
  • Monday, July 16, 2018 It's a Wrap: Soorma star Diljit Dosanjh and Hockey legend Sandeep Singh in conversation with Parul Sharma
  • Monday, July 16, 2018 Watch: Dalit man in Uttar Pradesh defies decades of prejudice by taking out baraat in Thakur-dominated Nizampur village
  • Monday, July 16, 2018 India's water crisis: After govt apathy, Odisha farmer carves out 3-km canal from hills to tackle scarcity in village
  • Sunday, July 15, 2018 Maurizio Sarri, named as new Chelsea manager, is owner Roman Abramovich's latest gamble in quest for 'perfect football'

Also See