Rafale row: Prashant Bhushan tells Supreme Court CAG gave redacted pricing detail for the first time in history
It is for the first time in CAG's history that it has given redacted pricing to Parliament in the Rafale fighter jet deal, activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan told the Supreme Court
Contrary to the CAG Act, the govt's auditor gave redacted price of Rafale jet in its report on the insistence of the government, Prashant Bhushan told SC
The petitioners also urged the SC to review its December judgment on Rafale deal, saying the Centre suppressed the material facts
Centre told the bench that the documents related to the Rafale deal were stolen from the Defence Ministry and threatened legal action against The Hindu newspaper
Publishing articles based on stolen documents amounts to violation of the Official Secrets Act, entailing maximum punishment of up to 14 years
The bench, which will hear the review petitions further on 14 March
New Delhi: It is for the first time in CAG's history that it has given redacted pricing to Parliament in the Rafale fighter jet deal, former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan told the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
The government itself has disclosed the price of the Rafale deal thrice in the Parliament, Bhushan told a bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph.
"The government itself disclosed thrice in the Parliament the price of Rafale fighter jet deal. They even gave the price of up-gradation of Mirage fighter aircraft. This is the first time in the history of Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) that redacted pricing of fighter jet deal were given. This is astonishing. This was done on the insistence of government," said Bhushan arguing on behalf of Sinha and Shourie as also himself.
He said the government knew beforehand that CAG report will contain redacted pricing of Rafale fighter jets.
"This is contrary to the CAG Act. They cannot table redacted pricing details before the Parliament and the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). This is the first time it has been done and the government knew about it," Bhushan added.
After Bhushan, the bench gave the opportunity to Shourie to make a submission and he said there was a need for reviewing the judgment as the Centre did not come up with clean hands and suppressed the material facts.
The Centre told the bench that the documents related to the Rafale fighter jet deal have been stolen from the Defence Ministry and threatened The Hindu newspaper with the Official Secrets Act for publishing articles based on them.
Those who put documents on the Rafale deal in the public domain are guilty under the Act as also contempt of court, Attorney General KK Venugopal said.
While publishing articles based on stolen documents amounts to violation of the Official Secrets Act, entailing maximum punishment of up to 14 years, the contempt law attracts six months jail as also a fine of Rs 2,000.
Sinha, Shourie and Bhushan, who had jointly filed the petition seeking review of the verdict on December 14 last year, alleged that the Centre suppressed crucial facts when the apex court decided to dismiss the batch of PILs.
The bench, which will hear the review petitions further on 14 March, was told by Venugopal that every statement of the apex court made in the Rafale case may be used to destabilise either the government or the opposition and therefore the court should refrain from making it.
The high voltage hearing saw the bench showering several tricky questions to the AG who was buttressing that the stolen materials cannot be relied to revisit the judgment dismissing the pleas and it was necessary to determine the sources who provided the sensitive documents.
A new report captures what ails Indian arts and culture sector: Poor budgets and data, institutional vacancies
The Budget Guide by Sahapedia notes that the marginal budget alloted to the sector, which averaged at 0.11 percent in the last decade, fell to a miniscule 0.07 percent in FY22.
The Shiv Sena leader also claimed there will be 'anarchy' if the COVID-19 cases continue to rise, and said that the situation was unprecedented and war-like