Goa Shiv Sena demands President's Rule in state in wake of Manohar Parrikar's absence

The Shiv Sena demanded that President's Rule be imposed in Goa in the wake of Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar's absence from the state

PTI March 13, 2018 14:48:08 IST
Goa Shiv Sena demands President's Rule in state in wake of Manohar Parrikar's absence

Panaji: The Shiv Sena on Tuesday demanded that President's Rule be imposed in Goa in the wake of Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar's absence from the state.

Last week, Parrikar has gone to the US for medical treatment.

In the absence of Parrikar, the state has been left "headless" and no one has the authority to take decisions on key issues, like the impending crisis in the mining industry, the Sena's Goa spokesperson, Rakhi Prabhudesai Naik, said in a statement.

Goa Shiv Sena demands Presidents Rule in state in wake of Manohar Parrikars absence

File image of Goa chief minister Manohar Parrikar. Reuters

The recent statement of Goa Forward Party (the BJP's ally) chief Vijai Sardesai that Goa is facing an Emergency-like situation is a true reflection of the state of things here, she said.

"In the absence of Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar, the state is left headless, and deserves to be ruled by the president of India," she said.

Naik said the state has been left headless at a time when it is facing closure of the mining industry and there is no one to speak for the interest of people dependent on it.

The Supreme Court had last month quashed the second renewal of iron ore mining leases given to 88 companies in Goa in 2015.

The apex court said it was giving time till 15 March to mining leaseholders, who have been granted a second renewal in violation of its previous directions, to manage their affairs.

They are directed to stop all mining operations with effect from 16 March, until fresh mining leases (not fresh renewals or other renewals) are granted and fresh environmental clearances are granted, the court said.

Naik alleged that the people dependent on mining industry are only getting false promises and seeing the "melodrama" of delegations going to Delhi.

"No solution has been provided to their problems and certainly, in the current situation, we can't expect a solution from the cabinet advisory committee which is the least bothered about people," she alleged.

Before leaving Goa, Parrikar had formed a three-member cabinet advisory committee comprising Vijai Sardesai, Sudin Dhavalikar and Francis D'Souza to guide the state administration in his absence.

Naik claimed that the committee has not even held a meeting to discuss the situation that may arise after the mines are closed.

The Shiv Sena said the state needed President's Rule so that at least the Centre could take over and provide some relief to people dependent on the mining industry.

The Sena is an ally of the BJP at the Centre and in Maharashtra. It does not have any representation in the Goa Assembly.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

'Majority with us': Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot promises Assembly session soon, meets Governor
Politics

'Majority with us': Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot promises Assembly session soon, meets Governor

Gehlot said that though he hopes some of the dissident Congress MLAs will be present in the Rajasthan Assembly, without them too, his government has a majority in the House

Plea in SC seeks to remove words 'socialist', 'secular' from Constitution's preamble
India

Plea in SC seeks to remove words 'socialist', 'secular' from Constitution's preamble

The court is conducting day-to-day hearings in the case to complete the trial by 31 August, as directed by the Supreme Court.

SC's actions in Prashant Bhushan, Twitter case show court as vehicle for administration, not dispenser of justice
India

SC's actions in Prashant Bhushan, Twitter case show court as vehicle for administration, not dispenser of justice

If Twitter has an obligation to unilaterally take down tweets without an order, then the SC must not just state the source of this obligation but also spell out when this obligation is activated