'Didn't see protests coming': BJP scrambles to control backlash over CAA as thousands join protests against new law
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government did not anticipate the protests against the amended Citizenship Act that have raged across the country and is now scrambling to control the damage, members of his ruling party said.
In Modi’s biggest challenge since taking office in 2014, hundreds of thousands have protested against the law offering citizenship to immigrants from non-Muslim minorities who have fled Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan
At least 21 people have died in clashes with police
Leaders of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were taken aback by the backlash, some party members told Reuters
Mumbai: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government did not anticipate the protests against the amended Citizenship Act that have raged across the country and is now scrambling to control the damage, members of his ruling party said.
In Modi’s biggest challenge since taking office in 2014, hundreds of thousands have protested against the law offering citizenship to immigrants from non-Muslim minorities who have fled Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.
At least 21 people have died in clashes with police.
Leaders of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were taken aback by the backlash, some party members told Reuters. They said they had been prepared for some anger from Muslims, but not the widespread protests that have convulsed most major cities for two weeks.
Now the party and the government are reaching out for help in defusing the crisis to allies and opponents sidelined when the bill passed earlier this month, the sources said.
“I really did not see the protests coming,” Sanjeev Balyan, a ruling party legislator and junior federal minister, told Reuters. Balyan, who initially said other BJP lawmakers were also caught off guard, said on Thursday he had been wrong to suggest that and that he could not characterise their thinking.
While there is no threat to his big parliamentary majority, the 69-year-old Modi’s reputation as a master strategist with his finger on the pulse of the people has taken a hit.
Publicly, his government has prioritised development, seeking to make India a $5 trillion economy by 2025.
But Modi’s muscular pro-Hindu platform has also gone down well in a nation that is over 80% Hindu; he won back-to-back national elections with thumping majorities.
Outrage at the citizenship law has been fanned by resentment against the government for following a majoritarian agenda instead of addressing an economic slowdown and loss of jobs.
In a nation with a history pocked with sectarian bloodshed, many Muslims fear that the new law — and a planned national citizenship register — could make the minority second-class citizens.
Students, politicians, and rights activists, both Hindus and Muslims, have also taken to the streets, saying Modi is jeopardising India’s secular constitution.
The government denies that the citizenship register is imminent and says none of the changes will affect existing citizens.
Three other BJP lawmakers and two central ministers, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said they were mobilising party supporters from all walks of life to start community dialogues and dispel discontent over the law and the register.
“I believe that the political math behind the clearance of this law was not taken into account,” said one of the federal ministers, an apparent reference to lack of consultation with allies and Opposition parties.
Home Minister Amit Shah, widely seen as the second most powerful man in the country, repeated in a television interview on Tuesday that Muslims had no cause for worry.
“We are all in damage control mode,” said the other central minister, adding that the BJP and hardline Hindu allies have launched a campaign to explain that the law is not discriminatory.
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which is the ideological parent of the BJP, has also launched a movement across urban slums to counter opposition to the bill.
“The violent protests are not because the people were not properly informed about the new law, but because they were intentionally wrongly informed by forces with vested interests,” Manmohan Vaidya, a senior RSS leader, told Reuters.
Analysts say various reasons for discontent were coalescing.
“It’s evident that people are protesting against the law and also venting against Modi’s autocratic style of leadership,” said Sanjay Kumar, director of research institute the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies.
“The economic crisis gives further incentive ... I don’t see these protests fading very soon.”
When Modi, a veteran politician and son of a tea seller, came to power five-and-a-half years ago, he promised growth, jobs and development. But he was criticised for haphazard tax reform and shock demonetisation of high value currency notes in his first term — which have contributed to an economic slowdown — as well as intolerance for dissent and ignoring anti-Muslim hate crimes.
Nevertheless, he was re-elected with an even stronger majority earlier this year after a strong response to a security standoff with old foe Pakistan.
In August, Modi’s government withdrew semi-autonomous privileges for Jammu and Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority state, and downgraded it to a centrally-ruled territory.
In November, the Supreme Court ruled that a Hindu temple could be built at Ayodhya where a right-wing mob tore down a 16th-century mosque in 1992, one of India’s most divisive disputes. The government welcomed the decision.
Then came the citizenship law.
“I feel they can’t create jobs and hence they are passing such a disturbing law,” said Ghanshyam Tiwari, a student protesting in the city of Lucknow this month.
The protests are backed by the main Opposition party, the Congress, which has dominated Indian politics for most of the 72 years since Independence but was soundly beaten in the last two national elections. It said the gloves were off between secular India and Modi’s hardline Hindu agenda.
“For the first time in India’s history a law has been framed on the basis of religion,” Prithviraj Chavan, a senior Congress leader, told Reuters. “The ruling party’s strategy to make India a Hindu-first nation has backfired.”
Lithuania is a member of NATO and is thus subject to its protections under Article 5 which states that an attack on one member is an attack on all members
UK approves Julian Assange’s US extradition: A look back at Wikileaks founder's 'crimes’, his long legal battle
To his supporters, the 50-year-old is a secrecy-busting journalist who exposed US military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. But US prosecutors claim Assange put lives at risk when he helped intelligence agent Chelsea Manning steal diplomatic cables and military files which Wikileaks later publish
Built by China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited, the Fujian has a displacement of more than 80,000 tonnes and is equipped with electromagnetic catapults and arresting devices