Delhi High Court quashes summons against Smriti Irani in defamation case filed by Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam

Nirupam had said he had sent a legal notice to Irani through his counsel, asking her to tender an 'unconditional public apology' for allegedly making defamatory comments, but she did not reply to it.

Press Trust of India December 19, 2018 08:56:04 IST
Delhi High Court quashes summons against Smriti Irani in defamation case filed by Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday quashed the summons issued against Union minister Smriti Irani in a defamation complaint filed against her by Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam.

Delhi High Court quashes summons against Smriti Irani in defamation case filed by Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam

File image of Union minister Smriti Irani. PTI

The court, however, dismissed a similar plea by Nirupam's seeking to set aside the summons issued against him in a cross-defamation complaint filed by Irani.

The court said the case against Nirupam will continue.

Justice RK Gauba passed two separate verdicts on the plea of the two leaders.

In her plea, Irani had sought quashing of the summons issued to her by a trial court on June 6, 2014. She had also sought quashing of the complaint filed by Nirupam.

Nirupam had challenged a magisterial court's 11 March, 2013 order summoning him in Irani's defamation complaint against him. He had also sought quashing of the 1 January, 2013 complaint filed by Irani.

The court did not mention the actual names of Irani and Nirupam in the judgment and cause list. While Irani was referred as 'PQR' in the judgment, Nirupam was addressed as 'XYZ'.

"The petitioner and the second respondent have been in public life for quite long, engaged in active politics and associated with the political parties that generally have been seen to be opposed to each other. In their interest, their names have been withheld from mention, including in the cause-title," the judge said in the opening paragraph of both the judgements.

The high court had reserved its orders on 13 November.

It had earlier advised both the leaders to arrive at a compromise with regard to the defamation cases they have filed against each other.

Nirupam, a former Congress MP, had filed the complaint against Irani, alleging that on December 20, 2012, when the Gujarat Assembly poll results were announced, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader had made "defamatory and scurrilous comments" against him during a television debate "by making direct aspersions on the character of the complainant (Nirupam)".

Nirupam had said he had sent a legal notice to Irani through his counsel, asking her to tender an "unconditional public apology" for allegedly making defamatory comments, but she did not reply to it.

Earlier, Irani had filed a complaint against Nirupam for allegedly defaming her during the same debate on a private television news channel and the court had framed charges against the Congress leader for using derogatory and indecent language against the Union Textiles minister.

On Irani's complaint, the court had put Nirupam on trial under Sections 500 -- defamation and 509 -- uttering any word or making any gesture intended to insult the modesty of a woman -- of the Indian Penal Code.

Irani had alleged in her complaint that Nirupam had questioned her credentials to analyse poll results given her background as a television actress.

Updated Date:

also read

Lakhimpur Kheri: BJP will pay a heavy price for attack on farmers, says Sharad Pawar
Politics

Lakhimpur Kheri: BJP will pay a heavy price for attack on farmers, says Sharad Pawar

Expressing anguish over the deaths, Pawar assured the farmers that the entire Opposition is with them and will soon take a call on the future course of action

Priyanka, Congress leaders don't have right to speak about democracy, farmers: Uma Bharti
Politics

Priyanka, Congress leaders don't have right to speak about democracy, farmers: Uma Bharti

The senior BJP leader said Congress, which imposed Emergency in the country, has lost the right to pronounce the word democracy, further claiming that the party burnt 10,000 Sikhs alive

BSF jurisdiction row: Punjab CM  ‘surrendered’ more than half state to Centre, claims AAP
Politics

BSF jurisdiction row: Punjab CM  ‘surrendered’ more than half state to Centre, claims AAP

The Centre has increased the powers of the BSF by increasing its jurisdiction in poll-bound Punjab by up to 50 km from the international border