Blow to Mehbooba govt: Another PDP leader quits party over 'bloodbath' of Kashmiris
'I am resigning from the basic membership of the PDP as I cannot side with the bloodbath of Kashmiris,' Mandoo, who was Senior VP of the party's Srinagar unit said.
Srinagar: In a set back to the ruling PDP, party leader Nisar Ahmad Mandoo on Sunday resigned from the party saying he cannot side with "bloodbath" of Kashmiris, the second prominent leader to resign in the wake of the ongoing unrest in Kashmir.
"I am resigning from the basic membership of the PDP as I cannot side with the bloodbath of Kashmiris," Mandoo, who was senior vice president of the party's Srinagar unit, told reporters in Srinagar.
Mandoo also cited "anti-people" policies of BJP-PDP coalition in the state as a reason for his resignation. "I have been associated with PDP for the past 16 years. The party was formed to protect the lives and political dignity of people but today the party has deviated from these principles," he said.
Mandoo is the second prominent leader of the ruling party to resign in the wake of the ongoing unrest in Kashmir that has left 81 persons dead and thousands of others injured. Tariq Hameed Karra, founding member of the PDP and Lok Sabha member from Srinagar constituency, resigned from the party as well as the Parliament seat on 15 September over civilians' killings.
Before his death, Prasada Sr who had contested and lost against Sonia Gandhi for the leadership of Congress was totally disillusioned with the Congress and Gandhis, in particular
Sharma's appointment to the post negates the chances of his induction in the UP cabinet because of the BJP's larger principle of one-man-one-post, a party leader said
In battle between pro and anti-Modi group of retired diplomats, ideology and politics trump objectivity
Former diplomats speak from an elevated podium. Recent criticisms put forward by them, however, are by and large polemical attacks driven by a strong dislike of the prime minister. They have every right to do so but these comments should then be construed as political, and not objective policy assessments.