Uttarakhand HC verdict: BJP’s predatory instincts have backfired

BJP's cavalier invocation of President's Rule backfired in Uttarakhand, with the Uttarakhand High Court scraping the imposition of Article 356.

Ajay Singh April 22, 2016 09:10:14 IST
Uttarakhand HC verdict: BJP’s predatory instincts have backfired

Following the landmark SR Bommai Judgment, the imposition of the President’s Rule became justiciable. Those with elementary understanding of law would know that the invocation of article 356 in a cavalier manner is nothing but political hara-kiri. BJP’s master strategists had seemed determined to go down a suicidal path when they imposed President’s Rule in Uttarakhand.

There was little doubt that Chief Minister Harish Rawat had lost support of the majority of legislators when his nine MLAs revolted against him. But, this was an internal crisis of the Congress party, and the Centre had no role to fish in troubled water.

The BJP sensed the kill and went for the jugular. Those within the party and acquainted with the affairs admit that the party leadership gave a go ahead to bring down the government, as the slang goes, 'by hook or by crook'. Circumstances prove that there was no dearth of inducement even from the BJP’s side.

Now with the Uttarakhand High Court order, the BJP’s penchant for this kind of pragmatism has blown up in their face. The court set aside President’s Rule in the state, and Uttarakhand became the first case where the court applied the principles laid down in the SR Bommai judgment in practical terms.

Uttarakhand HC verdict BJPs predatory instincts have backfired

Deposed CM Harish Rawat, with Congress supporters, celebrating in Dehradun on Thursday as Uttarakhand HC quashed the imposition of President's rule in the state and revived the Congress government. PTI

Despite clear signs that the indiscretion of the union government and the BJP would not hold ground, the BJP’s obduracy to persist with the wrong proves that it is nothing but megalomaniac hubris.

From the moment the matter was referred in court, it became evident that the government was relying on hear-says and rumours instead of valid legal arguments, to topple the Harish Rawat government in Uttarakhand.

Not even once did the Attorney General of India back his argument with facts like governor’s reports or the home ministry’s assessments about the breakdown of the constitutional machinery in the state.

On the other hand, there were enough indications to suggest that Governor KK Paul was hesitant to precipitate the crisis in Uttarakhand. Rather, he asked Harish Rawat to prove majority on the floor of the house.

And as the inter-state council recommendations and the Bommai judgment mandated that the trial of strength would be held only on the floor of the house, it was a perfectly legitimate course to take.

Nevertheless, the BJP president Amit Shah and his lieutenant, loud mouth Kailah Vijayvargiya, persuaded the union government to pull the rug from under Rawat’s feet and topple the government.

They relied on the pretext of a dubious video recording that indicated that some congress legislators were willing to switch their loyalties in exchange for huge sums of money.

Ironically, insiders of the BJP admitted that it was equally involved in horse-trading and encouraging defection though money, just like the Congress. The perceived objective of the BJP was to grab power.

What is most significant in the whole crisis is the role of the home ministry. Not even once did Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh make a comment on developments in Uttarakhand.

Apparently, the home ministry was wary of making this recommendation though ultimately succumbed to the pressure of political leadership. Rajnath Singh, however, prevented himself from being dragged into the controversy. No doubt, though, that today’s court verdict has left the BJP with egg on its face.

On a governance front, it would be seen as personal humiliation for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is expected to don a bipartisan role in his constitutional position.

There have been many instances that indicate the BJP’s clever shifts in morality. In such a situation, it would not be wrong to assume that Modi’s carefully cultivated image of promoting federalism in the country had been grossly exaggerated, and that his claims appear to be mere deception, at least in the present context.

Political exigencies of the BJP are clearly taking a toll on ethical governance and it seems that the BJP’s predatory instincts have backfired.

Updated Date:

also read

'Dismantling Global Hindutva' event an academic assault on Hinduism

'Dismantling Global Hindutva' event an academic assault on Hinduism

Hinduism has long been under the assault by western academia since the dawn of the colonial era of European supremacism

'Dismantling Global Hindutva' event propels first major global mobilisation of Hindus

'Dismantling Global Hindutva' event propels first major global mobilisation of Hindus

The ground was being laid for a while, as Hindus in the US have campaigned against representation of their faith in school textbooks in California a little more than a decade ago, and against various scurrilous academic references

Secularism 101: Punjab must always have Sikh CM, but India must elect non-Hindu PM

Secularism 101: Punjab must always have Sikh CM, but India must elect non-Hindu PM

Secularism for Indian ‘secular’ intelligentsia has long been an engrossing game of shifting goalposts