The decks were cleared for the 12 September general council and executive committee meeting called by Chief Minister E Palaniswamy-led faction after the Madras High Court on Monday
dismissed a plea
by an MLA owing allegiance to sidelined AIADMK deputy chief TTV Dhinakaran. The fate of jailed AIADMK leader VK Sasikla hangs in the balance. Dhinakaran aide plea dismissed Justice CV Karthikeyan dismissed the application filed by MLA P Vetrivel and fined him Rs one lakh for “wasting the time of the court”. In his suit, the MLA sought a permanent injunction restraining Palaniswamy and deputy chief minister O Panneerselvam from using the name AIADMK (Amma)and AIADMK (Puratchi Talaivi Amma) in any manner and calling the general council meeting. He also filed an application seeking an interim order staying the meeting. The judge pointed out that being an MLA, the applicant should have taken note of a circular issued by the high court earlier, which stated that MPs and MLAs should first get the nod of the chief justice for filing petitions. Vetrivel filed the suit without getting the nod the judge said. Referring to the contention of his counsel that the suit has been filed in Vetrivel’s individual capacity and also that the defendants had been sued in their individual names, Justice Karthikeyan said it had only helped the applicant to circumvent to the court’s circular. [caption id=“attachment_4033987” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]
File image of jailed AIADMK supremo VK Sasikala.[/caption] Coming down heavily on the applicant, the judge in his order said he did not have any cause of action. He then said Vetrivel had three options: Attend tomorrow’s meeting either in his individual capacity or as a MLA, choose to remain at his home with his family and friends and enjoy lunch and afternoon siesta or resign from his post as a legislator and be rid of the irritants which upset his peace of mind. When Vetrivel’s counsel made a request to grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the Election Commission against the general council meet, the judge observed that no one could prevent any person from approaching an appropriate forum to vent grievances. Later, senior counsel TV Ramanujam appeared before the first bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar and made a special mention stating that they would file an appeal against the single judge’s order. The chief justice told the counsel to file the appeal and approach the appropriate bench for taking up the issue. Decision to hold meeting taken on 28 August The decision to hold a general council meeting on 12 September was taken during the 28 August meeting. The meeting, however, not attended by some of the party MLAs and MPs. During the meeting, the validity of the appointments made by Sasikala before going to jail in the Rs 66.6 crore disproportionate assets case was also discussed,
AIADMK sources
told PTI. Convened by Palaniswamy and attended by senior party functionaries and ministers, the 28 August meeting also discussed Dhinakaran’s recent shuffling of the party ranks, sources said. Dhinakaran removed Palaniswamy as the party’s Salem district secretary on Sunday, besides sacking many other ministers from party posts. Speaking on the agenda of the 12 September meeting, AIADMK sources told PTI that _s_teps would be taken to consider removing Sasikala as the chief of the party at the meeting of the general council, the apex body of the AIADMK. With inputs from PTI
)