1984 riots: US court to hear Cong's challenge to rights violation

1984 riots: US court to hear Cong's challenge to rights violation

FP Archives January 29, 2014, 14:47:01 IST

A US court will hear on 19 March a motion filed by the Congress party seeking dismissal of a human rights violation lawsuit against it in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.

Advertisement
1984 riots: US court to hear Cong's challenge to rights violation

New York: A US court will hear on 19 March a motion filed by the Congress party seeking dismissal of a human rights violation lawsuit against it in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.

US District Judge Robert Sweet ordered that the court will hear Congress party’s motion to dismiss the pending human rights violation lawsuit brought against it by rights group Sikh For Justice (SFJ).

Advertisement

CONGYOUTH_AFP Eminent Indian-American Attorney Ravi Batra, who represents the Congress party in the US, had filed the motion in Manhattan federal court on 17 January seeking an order to dismiss the complaint.

Batra had sought the dismissal citing lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

SFJ has time till 17 February to respond to the Congress party’s motion and Batra will then have to file his response by 10 March.

The group filed the case under the Alien Torts Statute (ATS) and Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) which grants jurisdiction to US Courts to hear human rights violation cases committed outside the country.

Advertisement

Batra has said that SFJ claims that it is pursuing relief on behalf of third-parties for whom they have not established a legal ability to act.

“SFJ’s sole claim to representative authority is their unadorned claim to have been ‘formed to seek justice and compensation for those Sikhs who were injured or whose family members were killed and whose property was destroyed’ during the 1984 riots.

Advertisement

“Nowhere does SFJ even claim to have authority from any person to bring claims on their behalf, nor does it allege having been appointed the ’legal representative’ of anyone by a Court of competent jurisdiction,” he said.

PTI

Written by FP Archives

see more

Latest News

Find us on YouTube

Subscribe

Top Shows

Vantage First Sports Fast and Factual Between The Lines