Vantage | Why Muizzu's moves aren't about strategic autonomy but poking India

In stark contrast to the cautious beginnings of most leaders, Mohamed Muizzu, the President of the Maldives, has adopted a rapid and assertive approach since assuming office. His actions mirror the urgency often seen in modern social media challenges underscoring his determination to expedite change.

Muizzu’s acquisition of Turkish drones

Muizzu’s latest move involves the procurement of surveillance drones from Turkey, signalling a significant departure from Maldives’ traditional defence strategies. These high-tech assets, costing millions, are intended to bolster Maldives’ defence capabilities and assert its sovereignty in the Indian Ocean.

By opting to conduct surveillance of its Exclusive Economic Zone independently, Muizzu signals a shift away from the joint efforts previously undertaken with India. This move reflects Maldives’ aspiration for self-reliance and autonomy in safeguarding its territorial interests.

“I believe that modern military capability to defend the country by road, sea and air should be strengthened in the Maldives. We have started to do that now, if God wills. The Maldivian Defence Force will soon be able to conduct the surveillance of the 900,000 square kilometre Exclusive Economic Zone of the Maldives, 24 hours a day,” said President Muizzu.

Muizzu’s anti-India agenda

Since taking office, Muizzu has consistently pursued policies antagonistic to India, from expelling Indian soldiers to prioritising ties with Turkey and China. The acquisition of Turkish drones serves as another step in his agenda to distance The Maldives from its historical ally.

Despite claims of pursuing strategic autonomy, Muizzu’s actions appear driven by a desire to challenge India rather than diversify alliances. The presence of a Chinese spy vessel in Maldives’ waters further reinforces concerns about Muizzu’s alignment with Beijing’s interests.

As Maldives approaches parliamentary elections, Muizzu’s anti-India rhetoric may yield short-term political gains. However, the long-term implications of alienating a regional ally in favour of geopolitical posturing remain uncertain, raising questions about the durability of alliances and regional stability.

Muizzu’s rapid manoeuvers underscore the risks of prioritising short-term gains over long-term strategic stability. As the geopolitical landscape continues to evolve, Maldives’ trajectory under Muizzu’s leadership serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the complexities and challenges of navigating regional politics in the Indian Ocean.

Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.