Vantage | Why India's words on US universities' protests marks a big policy shift

India has just played a diplomatic ‘uno-reverse’ game. It is quite a rare one, too. A lot of US colleges have become protest sites. Thousands of students are rallying for Gaza. They are accusing their government of supporting a ‘genocide’. They have been reverted with a crackdown. Hundreds of protesting students have been arrested, sometimes quite violently.

Normally, India wouldn’t react to something like this, but this time, New Delhi has broken that trend. The Ministry of External Affairs has reacted to the college protests. It had some advice for the White House: “Democracies should display understanding in regard to other democracies. After all, we are all judged by what we do at home and not what we say abroad.”

There is no room for doubt here. India is clearly talking about the US.

But notice the language. New Delhi has not criticised America’s handling of the issue, nor has it expressed concern. Instead, it has served a reminder for Washington.

More from Opinion

Sergio Gor’s senate hearing signals the future of Indo-American ties How Trump’s ‘War on Drugs’ buildup against Venezuela has a hidden agenda

India understands the need for public order. But wish the US understood the same in the case of India. This is a significant policy change for New Delhi.

This doesn’t weaken or change the bilateral relationship, but it does send a message. The US was gripped by the Black Lives Matter movement; an unarmed black man had been killed by police officers. There were protests and riots in US cities, but New Delhi said nothing. European capitals criticised the US; comments came from China, yet nothing from India. India does not make unsolicited comments and only reacts when it is particularly targeted or defamed.

Like when US reports questioned freedoms in India. Or, when rights agencies talked about Indian secularism, India would hit back, but this is different.

These college protests have nothing to do with India. The students are calling out Joe Biden. They do not have beef with India. Yet, the ministry has reacted. The question is: is this the new policy? Will we also see comments on other issues? Like on the condition of migrants in Europe, the crackdown in Hong Kong, or the genocide in Xinjiang.

Impact Shorts

More Shorts

How army remains Pakistan’s biggest business house

60 years on, why 1965 India–Pakistan war still matters

India’s tone has become harsher. This change can be seen right at the top. Even Foreign Minister S Jaishankar recently talked about the Western coverage of India’s elections.

We get advice from western press, if they criticise our democracy, it was not bcz of lack Information bcz they think they are also political players in our elections..games which are being played says EAM Jaishankar pic.twitter.com/Q5t4PoOUoL

— Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) April 24, 2024

“We get advice from the Western press; if they criticise our democracy, it is not because they lack information because they think they are also political players in the election games that are being played,” said EAM Jaishankar. Again, a harsh tone. The idea here is not to antagonise others. The idea is to make them understand that unsolicited comments are not welcome.

America commented on India’s issues – the farmers protest, the new citizenship act, and, of course, the general commentary on human rights – the US never tried to understand the nuances; Washington saw and reacted, but now it has a taste of its own medicine. Let’s see how they respond to it.

The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.