 "How great powers fuelling the arms race in West Asia threaten global security")
The international arms trade has long been a key instrument of geopolitical influence, shaping regional dynamics and global power structures. The United States and Russia, two of the world’s foremost military powers, have been particularly active in this arena, with the former heavily arming Israel and the latter supporting various adversaries of the US and its allies, including Iran. As these two nations continue to supply advanced weaponry to opposing sides in critical geopolitical regions, the implications for regional stability and global security are profound and multifaceted.
The US and Israel: A Strategic Alliance
For several decades, the United States has cultivated a deeply entrenched and formidable military partnership with Israel, characterised by the transfer of substantial arms and the fostering of comprehensive defence cooperation. This alliance is not merely a matter of convenience; it is rooted in a convergence of strategic interests, particularly in the shared objective of countering the growing influence of Iran and its allied proxies across the volatile Middle Eastern landscape.
In its steadfast support of Israel, the US extends approximately $3.8 billion annually in military aid, a figure that not only highlights the magnitude of their collaboration but also reflects the profound commitment the US has towards ensuring Israel’s security amidst an increasingly complex regional dynamic. This aid is far from nominal; it encompasses some of the most advanced military technologies available today. Among these are the highly sophisticated F-35 fighter jets, renowned for their stealth and combat capabilities, and precision-guided munitions that allow for pinpoint accuracy in targeted strikes, minimising collateral damage and maximising strategic impact.
Moreover, the US has also been instrumental in bolstering Israel’s defensive capabilities through the provision of state-of-the-art missile defence systems such as the Iron Dome and David’s Sling. The Iron Dome has gained global recognition for its effectiveness in intercepting and neutralising short-range rockets and artillery shells, thereby providing a critical shield against threats emanating from hostile territories. David’s Sling, on the other hand, is designed to counter medium- to long-range rockets, cruise missiles, and other aerial threats, ensuring a layered defence system that significantly enhances Israel’s security apparatus.
Impact Shorts
More ShortsThis military relationship, underscored by the consistent and robust flow of advanced weaponry and defence systems, exemplifies the enduring bond between the two nations. It is a partnership that goes beyond mere transactions; it is a strategic alliance that is pivotal to the geopolitical balance of power in the Middle East. The United States, by reinforcing Israel’s military prowess, is not only safeguarding its ally but is also asserting its own influence and interests in a region that remains one of the most strategically significant and conflict-prone in the world.
In the broader context, this extensive military support also serves as a deterrent against the ambitions of Iran and its proxies, signalling that any aggression will be met with a formidable defence. The US-Israel military cooperation, thus, stands as a bulwark against instability, seeking to maintain a semblance of order amidst the ongoing turbulence in the Middle East. This relationship, rooted in shared strategic imperatives, continues to be a cornerstone of US foreign policy in the region, reflecting a commitment to security and stability that resonates far beyond the immediate borders of Israel.
This level of military support has enabled Israel to maintain a qualitative military edge over its regional adversaries. However, it also contributes to the ongoing arms race in the region, as rival states, particularly those aligned with Iran, seek to counterbalance Israeli capabilities. The US justification for arming Israel rests on ensuring the security of a key ally in a volatile region, but it also reflects broader strategic objectives, including the containment of Iranian influence and the protection of US interests in the Middle East.
Russia and Its Strategic Counterbalance
In contrast, Russia has positioned itself as a key arms supplier to countries that are often at odds with U.S. interests. Iran, Syria, and, to a lesser extent, Hezbollah, have all benefited from Russian military support. This support includes sophisticated air defence systems like the S-400, which has recently been delivered to Iran, signalling a significant escalation in military capabilities that could alter the balance of power in the region.
Russia’s strategy of arming these states serves multiple purposes. First, it bolsters Russia’s influence in the Middle East, a region where it has historically sought to challenge US hegemony. By providing advanced weaponry to Iran and other anti-American proxies, Russia not only strengthens these states militarily but also politically, as they become more capable of resisting US and Israeli pressure.
Moreover, Russia’s arms transfers are part of a broader geopolitical strategy aimed at undermining US influence globally. By aligning itself with states like Iran, Russia can indirectly challenge US interests in the Middle East while also securing lucrative arms deals that bolster its defence industry at home.
Implications for Regional Stability
The ongoing arms race between US-backed Israel and Russian-supported adversaries like Iran poses significant risks to regional stability. The influx of advanced weaponry into an already volatile region increases the likelihood of military confrontations, which could escalate into larger conflicts. For instance, Israel’s acquisition of advanced US weapons systems is often perceived as a direct threat by Iran, prompting it to seek similar capabilities from Russia.
Furthermore, the militarisation of regional conflicts through external arms supplies complicates diplomatic efforts to resolve these disputes peacefully. As states become more heavily armed, their reliance on military solutions to geopolitical problems increases, diminishing the prospects for negotiation and peaceful conflict resolution.
The situation is further exacerbated by the involvement of state-sponsored actors, such as Hezbollah, who also receive advanced weapons from state sponsors like Iran and Russia. These groups operate outside the traditional state framework, making them unpredictable and difficult to deter, which adds another layer of complexity to the regional security environment.
The Broader Global Implications
The ongoing rivalry between the United States and Russia in supplying arms to opposing factions in the Middle East is emblematic of a broader and deeply rooted pattern of global competition between these two superpowers. This geopolitical tug-of-war is not confined to the tumultuous sands of the Middle East; it stretches its tentacles into other strategically vital regions, such as Eastern Europe. Here, the arms supplied by both the US and Russia play a pivotal role in shaping the contours of conflicts like the ongoing war in Ukraine, a stark reminder of how this rivalry reverberates across the globe.
As the United States and Russia continue to deploy arms supplies as instruments of their geopolitical influence, the stakes in this great game rise ever higher. The spectre of proxy conflicts escalating into direct confrontations between these nuclear-armed giants looms large, casting a long shadow over global peace and stability. The contemporary security landscape is increasingly dominated by a multipolar arms race, where not only the US and Russia but also other powers like China are fiercely vying for global influence through the projection of military might.
This trend, if allowed to persist, could have far-reaching and perilous consequences. In the long run, it heralds the emergence of a more fragmented and unstable world order, where regional conflicts become more frequent and devastating, fuelled by the unrelenting flow of sophisticated weaponry. The international community’s capacity to manage these simmering conflicts through diplomacy and established international institutions will be put to the test. The norms and frameworks that have governed international relations since the end of the Cold War are increasingly under strain, eroding as great-power competition intensifies.
In this evolving scenario, the delicate balance that has maintained global peace for decades is at risk of unravelling. The continuous infusion of advanced weaponry into volatile regions exacerbates tensions, creating an environment where the possibility of miscalculations and unintended escalations becomes ever more likely. The very fabric of international diplomacy, woven through years of careful negotiation and mutual understanding, is fraying as these powerful nations pursue their divergent interests with little regard for the broader implications.
Moreover, the implications of this arms race are not confined to the regions directly involved in these conflicts. The ripple effects are felt across the world, from the corridors of power in distant capitals to the everyday lives of people who may find themselves caught in the crossfire of this global competition. The unchecked flow of arms fuels not only state-level conflicts but also empowers terrorists and insurgent groups, further destabilising already fragile regions.
As India observes these developments from a position of strategic autonomy, there is a clear recognition of the dangers posed by this unbridled arms race finding its way to forces inimical to India. The lessons of history are not lost on a nation that has seen its share of conflicts and understands the value of diplomatic engagement and peaceful coexistence. The world stands at a crossroads, where the choices made by global powers in the coming years will determine whether we move towards a more peaceful, cooperative global order or descend into an era of perpetual conflict and instability.
The challenge for the international community, and particularly for rising powers like India, is to advocate for and contribute to a new paradigm of global security—one that emphasises dialogue over discord, cooperation over confrontation, and peace over proliferation. As the traditional structures of global governance face unprecedented challenges, there is an urgent need for renewed efforts to strengthen multilateral institutions, promote disarmament, and build a collective security framework that can withstand the pressures of this new era of great power rivalry. The path forward is fraught with challenges, but with a commitment to peace and stability, a more secure and prosperous world remains within reach.
Conclusion: A Precarious Future
The US and Russia’s ongoing arming of Israel and its adversaries is a microcosm of the larger geopolitical struggle between these two powers. While these arms transfers serve their immediate strategic interests, they also contribute to a more dangerous and unstable global security environment. The Middle East, already a region fraught with conflict, stands at the brink of further escalation because of this arms race.
The future of regional and global stability hinges on the ability of the international community to address the underlying causes of these conflicts and manage the competition between the US and Russia in a way that minimises the risk of escalation. Without concerted diplomatic efforts and a rethinking of current strategies, the world may be heading towards a period of increased instability and conflict, with potentially catastrophic consequences.
The author is a columnist, Group Captain (retd) and a former fighter pilot of the IAF. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
