 "Eagle-44 airbase: How Iran’s mountain fortress is a game changer in Iran-Israel standoff")
Deep within Iran’s rugged Zagros Mountains lies a military marvel that’s reshaping the balance of power in the Middle East—the Eagle-44. This hidden fortress, packed with long-range missiles, resilient drones, and fortified bunkers, isn’t just a strategic asset; it’s a bold declaration in Iran’s shadow war with Israel. As regional tensions simmer, Eagle-44 emerges as a potent deterrent and a nightmare scenario for Israel’s defence planners.
What makes this underground base so formidable, and how could it escalate the Iran-Israel conflict to unprecedented levels? Dive into the hidden depths of Eagle-44 and discover why this secret base could redefine Middle Eastern security forever.
What is Eagle 44
The Eagle-44 missile base, unveiled by Iran in July 2023, is a crucial addition to the country’s military infrastructure, reflecting Tehran’s ambition to fortify its defence capabilities and create a potent deterrent against regional adversaries, particularly Israel. As tensions between Iran and Israel continue to simmer—marked by covert operations, cyberattacks, and a protracted war of influence—the Eagle-44 base represents a strategic asset that could tilt the balance. Here’s an in-depth look at how the Eagle-44 could play a pivotal role in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, from its operational capabilities to its psychological impact on Israel’s defence strategy.
Strategic Role
The Iran-Israel conflict has grown increasingly complex, with each nation leveraging both conventional and unconventional warfare. Israel, with its superior air force and technological edge, has conducted numerous operations targeting Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure. In response, Iran has steadily expanded its missile and drone capabilities, developing underground facilities like Eagle-44 to safeguard its strategic assets from Israeli airstrikes.
Eagle-44, located in the protective embrace of the Zagros Mountains, bolsters Iran’s capacity to launch retaliatory strikes against Israel or its allies in the event of conflict. The base’s strategic positioning and fortified design provide Iran with a reliable counterstrike option, complicating any plans Israel might have for pre-emptive strikes. Israel’s strategy relies on rapid, precision attacks on Iran’s missile and nuclear capabilities; with bases like Eagle-44, however, Iran gains the ability to endure an initial assault and respond forcefully, potentially inflicting severe damage on Israeli assets.
Impact Shorts
More ShortsAdvanced Missiles for Long Range Threats
The Eagle-44 is equipped with a range of missiles that can strike targets deep within Israel. The Hoveizeh cruise missile, one of Iran’s most advanced, has a range of over 1,350 kilometres, making it capable of reaching virtually any point in Israel. The Raad-500 missile, known for its mobility and speed, is another powerful asset, allowing Iran to launch rapid attacks with minimal warning. These missiles are equipped with precision guidance systems, which enhance Iran’s ability to accurately target critical Israeli military installations, infrastructure, and urban centres if hostilities escalate.
Such long-range missile capabilities pose a direct threat to Israel’s Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow missile defence systems. While Israel’s defence architecture is sophisticated, it is not impenetrable. The sheer volume of missiles that the Eagle-44 can store and launch from its fortified position increases the potential for overwhelming Israeli defences, especially if combined with simultaneous attacks from other bases or allies in the region, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Drone Capabilities for Asymmetrical Warfare
Iran has invested heavily in drone technology, and Eagle-44 serves as a hub for both surveillance and combat drones. These drones are central to Iran’s strategy of asymmetrical warfare, allowing it to conduct operations against Israel without directly engaging in air-to-air combat, where Israel’s superior air force would dominate. Iran’s drones have previously been deployed against Israel and its allies, including Saudi Arabia, and are becoming increasingly sophisticated.
At Eagle-44, drones can serve multiple roles: gathering intelligence, attacking targets with minimal detection, and creating confusion in Israel’s airspace. The drones could be deployed in swarm formations, potentially overwhelming Israeli radar systems and causing delays in response. Furthermore, Iran could use these drones to probe weaknesses in Israel’s air defences, identify target vulnerabilities, and gather real-time data to aid in missile strikes.
Survivability and Resilience
One of the core benefits of the Eagle-44 is its survivability, thanks to its location within the mountainous terrain of the Zagros range. This environment provides substantial natural protection against airstrikes, including Israel’s advanced bunker-busting bombs. Eagle-44’s fortified infrastructure—encompassing underground missile silos, blast-resistant bunkers, and sophisticated launch facilities—ensures that Iran’s strategic weapons remain operational even under sustained bombardment.
For Israel, the existence of such a base complicates potential strike operations. A preemptive strike aimed at neutralising Iran’s missile capability would need to penetrate Eagle-44’s defences, likely requiring multiple waves of precision strikes to ensure complete destruction. The time and resources required for such an operation increase the risk and reduce the likelihood of success, particularly if Iran retaliates during or after the strikes.
Additionally, the resilience of the Eagle-44 serves as a message to Israel that any attempt to incapacitate Iran’s missile capabilities will be met with a prepared and entrenched response. This could deter Israeli leadership from launching preemptive strikes, forcing Israel to reconsider its approach to Iran’s missile program.
Psychological Warfare and Deterrence
Iran’s unveiling of the Eagle-44 is as much about psychological warfare as it is about military capability. Israel, already on high alert due to Iran’s advancements in missile technology and nuclear enrichment, now faces a visible and tangible representation of Iran’s deterrence strategy. The mere existence of Eagle-44 sends a message to Israeli decision-makers that any offensive against Iran will come at a steep cost.
This psychological dimension impacts not only Israel’s leadership but also its population, potentially stoking fears of retaliatory strikes. The psychological deterrence of a retaliatory Iranian strike could play a role in shaping Israeli public opinion, pressuring Israeli leaders to explore diplomatic avenues rather than escalating the conflict. In the event of an attack, Iran could utilize its missile and drone assets at Eagle-44 to target Israeli cities, a tactic that could have a profound impact on Israeli society and its perception of security.
The Ripple Effect
Eagle-44’s capabilities could also influence Iran’s regional allies, particularly Hezbollah and Syrian factions loyal to Tehran. By enhancing its missile and drone infrastructure, Iran strengthens its position as a regional power and demonstrates to its allies that it has the means to counter Israeli aggression. Hezbollah, which already possesses a significant missile stockpile, could benefit from technical and logistical support from Iran’s fortified bases like Eagle-44, improving its own deterrent posture.
For Israel, this dynamic creates a multi-front threat, with the risk of coordinated attacks from Iran-backed forces in Lebanon, Syria, and possibly Iraq. Eagle-44 amplifies Iran’s ability to support its allies and increases Israel’s strategic vulnerability to coordinated regional attacks. This scenario forces Israel to consider not only direct threats from Iran but also the broader network of proxies that could be mobilised in a conflict.
For the United States, which maintains a strategic interest in curbing Iran’s missile and nuclear ambitions, Eagle-44 represents a significant challenge. The base’s resilience against conventional strikes means that diplomatic efforts or alternative tactics may need to be prioritised. The US may bolster its missile defence systems in the Gulf region or increase intelligence support for Israel to counterbalance Iran’s missile capabilities.
Potential Israeli Responses
Faced with the strategic and psychological challenge posed by Eagle-44, Israel may adopt a variety of responses, from cyber warfare to diplomacy. Israel has a sophisticated cyber warfare unit that could attempt to disrupt Iran’s command and control systems at Eagle-44. However, Iran is aware of such capabilities and has invested in cybersecurity to protect its critical military infrastructure.
Another potential response could involve increased intelligence-sharing with allies like the United States to identify vulnerabilities in Iran’s defence. Collaborative efforts with the U.S. and Gulf states could provide Israel with additional military and economic leverage against Iran. Additionally, Israel may intensify its diplomatic efforts to pressure the international community to sanction Iran further, though Iran has repeatedly proven its resilience against sanctions.
While Israel is well-equipped to conduct surgical strikes on Iranian facilities, the Eagle-44 presents a unique challenge due to its protective terrain and robust fortifications. A direct strike on Eagle-44 would likely necessitate a prolonged military engagement, which could escalate into a larger regional conflict—something neither Israel nor Iran might prefer.
Broader Implications for US and Gulf Security
The unveiling of the Eagle-44 has implications for the United States and Gulf Arab states, many of which are uneasy about Iran’s growing missile and drone capabilities. The Gulf states, some of whom have normalised relations with Israel, view Iran as a common adversary. Eagle-44 could push these countries to strengthen their alliances and explore joint defence initiatives to counter the Iranian threat.
For the United States, which maintains a strategic interest in curbing Iran’s missile and nuclear ambitions, Eagle-44 represents a significant challenge. The base’s resilience against conventional strikes means that diplomatic efforts or alternative tactics may need to be prioritised. The US may bolster its missile defence systems in the Gulf region or increase intelligence support for Israel to counterbalance Iran’s missile capabilities.
Takeaways
Eagle-44 is more than just a military base; it is a cornerstone in Iran’s deterrence strategy against Israel. With its advanced missile and drone capabilities, fortified location, and strategic significance, the Eagle-44 enhances Iran’s ability to threaten and deter Israel. It forces Israel to contend with a resilient adversary capable of launching devastating retaliatory strikes even if its primary facilities are attacked.
As the Iran-Israel conflict continues, Eagle-44 will likely play a central role in shaping both nations’ strategies. For Israel, the challenge is clear: finding ways to neutralise or mitigate the threat posed by Eagle-44 without triggering a large-scale regional war. For Iran, Eagle-44 symbolises its resolve and ability to endure—and respond to—escalating hostilities. The base’s presence will likely serve as a critical factor in both deterrence and escalation, influencing the Iran-Israel conflict and regional stability in the years to come.
The author is a columnist, Group Captain (retd) and a former fighter pilot of the IAF. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
