UPSC exam notice neglects 4% reservation for differently-abled students, PIL informs Delhi HC

High Court issued notices to the Centre, UPSC and concerned ministries of various services, like IAS, IPS and IFS, for which the successful candidates are recruited

Press Trust of India August 10, 2020 18:26:49 IST
UPSC exam notice neglects 4% reservation for differently-abled students, PIL informs Delhi HC

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Monday asked the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) to give details about the method of computing vacancies in the All India Civil Services for which it carries out the recruitment process.

The query was posed to UPSC by a bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan while hearing a PIL which has challenged this year's notice announcing the details of the civil services preliminary examination, which is to be held in 4 October.

The challenge is on the grounds that the notice neglects the minimum reservation to be provided to differently-abled people.

The high court issued notices to the Centre, UPSC and concerned ministries of the various services, like IAS, IPS and IFS, to which the successful candidates are recruited, seeking their stand on the plea by NGO Sambhavana which has alleged that under the exam notice only expected approximate vacancies for the differently-abled people are mentioned and not the the four percent mandatory reservation mandated under the law.

The petition, filed through advocates Krishan Mahajan and Ajay Chopra, has contended that the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act of 2016 mandates that every government establishment shall reserve 4 percent of its total vacancies for those with benchmark disabilities.

However, the UPSC exam notice only mentions "expected approximate vacancies" — a category that does not exist under the law.

"The notice becomes a fraud on the Act since it gives four percent reservation of 796 expected approximate vacancies. To reserve something of that which does not legally exist is to legally give nothing." the petition has contended.

The NGO further claims that there is a mathematical error in calculating the 4 percent reservation in the expected vacancies numbering 796.

It has said that four percent reservation of 796 would come to 31.8 or 32 vacancies, whereas according to the notice the number is 24.

The petition further claims that even the subsequent distribution of the vacancies at the rate of one percent per category — deaf, blind, locomotor and multiple — is also not mathematically accurate.

It also said that even the backlog of vacancies have not been mentioned.

The court, while listing the matter for further hearing on 31 August, asked the UPSC to also mention the backlog of vacancies in its affidavit along with how it has calculated the vacancies for the differently-abled.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Delhi High Court vacates stay on publication of Gunning for the Godman, book on Asaram Bapu's conviction
Arts & Culture

Delhi High Court vacates stay on publication of Gunning for the Godman, book on Asaram Bapu's conviction

The publisher approached the high court challenging the trial court’s 4 September ex-parte interim injunction order restraining the publication of the book. It said the stay should be vacated.

Sports ministry to intimate Supreme Court next week before granting fresh recognition to NSFs
Sports

Sports ministry to intimate Supreme Court next week before granting fresh recognition to NSFs

The Apex court was hearing the sports ministry's appeal against the High Court order which prohibited the authorities from taking decision on granting recognition to NSFs without its prior nod.

Same sex marriage 'not recognised by our laws, society, values', Centre tells Delhi HC
India

Same sex marriage 'not recognised by our laws, society, values', Centre tells Delhi HC

The court was hearing a PIL asking for same sex marriages to be recognised under the Hindu Marriage Act and Special Marriage Act