Unnao and Kathua rape cases: Changes in substantial law meaningless until accompanied by changes in procedural law

The narrative of change in law, which is usually the main standpoint of protests in the wake of such incidents, is therefore self-defeating and mostly results in the number of false cases, with no effect on the deterrence of that particular crime

Raghav Pandey and Ramanand April 17, 2018 11:44:12 IST
Unnao and Kathua rape cases: Changes in substantial law meaningless until accompanied by changes in procedural law

There is no doubt that violence against women is a harsh reality of the society in which we live. The Dowry Act, Domestic Violence Act and similar legislations have attempted to strengthen the safeguards against such violence, but these laws could not bring the desired results on ground. This is evident in the fact that the number of incidents of such crimes remain significant and conviction rates remain low.

A similar trend can be observed with respect to the crime of rape:

The data primarily indicates that a change in the substantial law is not merely enough. The substantial law is the law prescribing a quantum of punishment for a particular crime. The procedural law is that which lays out the rules of procedure for establishing guilt.

Unnao and Kathua rape cases Changes in substantial law meaningless until accompanied by changes in procedural law

File image of a protest against the government's 'inaction' in the Kathua and Unnao rape incidents. PTI

Therefore, the substantial changes brought about in haste, as seen in the aftermath of the 2012 Delhi gangrape case, are not serving the purpose for which they were enacted.

As has been established, societies suffer from over-criminalisation when there is an excessive reliance upon the changes in criminal judicial system. In India, this problem is very acute because a change in the substantial law is the perceived as the most viable solution for any rampant crime.

It has to be stressed with authority, that such changes in substantial laws have no meaning, until and unless they are accompanied by peripheral changes in the procedural laws and changes with respect to the role of the judiciary. Also, such changes are not needed in the first place, if the existing rules are enforced diligently. India has long suffered this problem of many laws with little implementation.

The narrative of change in law, which is usually the main standpoint of protests in the wake of such incidents, is therefore self-defeating and mostly results in the number of false cases, with no effect on the deterrence of that particular crime.

Raghav Pandey is a senior fellow with the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT-Bombay.
Ramanand is an alumnus of Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

Updated Date:

also read

Explained: Mites that have sex on our faces at night could go extinct and why that’s a bad thing
World

Explained: Mites that have sex on our faces at night could go extinct and why that’s a bad thing

The microscopic creatures called Demodex folliculorum live on our hair and feast on the oils in the pores of our skin. At night, they leave the pores to find mates, find new follicles to have sex in and lay eggs

Into the metaverse: Hyderabad’s Yashoda Hospitals becomes first Indian healthcare group on platform
India

Into the metaverse: Hyderabad’s Yashoda Hospitals becomes first Indian healthcare group on platform

Yashoda Hospitals Group has acquired space on Decentraland — a metaverse platform where users can buy and sell property and engage in other life-like activities — to set up a virtual clinic it hopes will be operational for patients by next year

Explained: Why Russia is upset with Lithuania and the relevance of NATO’s Article 5
World

Explained: Why Russia is upset with Lithuania and the relevance of NATO’s Article 5

Lithuania is a member of NATO and is thus subject to its protections under Article 5 which states that an attack on one member is an attack on all members