SC stays contempt proceedings against Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank over rent payment
The Union minister had challenged the Uttarakhand High Court order that directed former chief ministers to pay rent at market rates for the entire period they occupied government accommodation since demitting office
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the contempt proceedings initiated against Union minister Ramesh Pokhriyal for alleged non-compliance with the Uttarakhand High Court's last year order on payment of rent by former chief ministers of the state for occupying government accommodation.
A bench headed by Justice RF Nariman stayed the contempt proceedings on a plea filed by the Union Minister of Education.
The Uttarakhand High Court had on 3 May last year ordered the former chief ministers of the state to pay market rent for the entire period they continued to occupy government accommodation since demitting office.
The high court had declared all government orders from 2001 providing housing and other facilities to former chief ministers in the state as illegal and unconstitutional.
The court had directed that all amount due and payable towards amenities such as electricity, water, petrol, oil, and lubricants provided by the state to the former chief ministers shall be computed by the state government within four months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.
It had also said that the amount shall be intimated to the former chief ministers, who shall within six months from the date of such intimation, pay the said amount to the state government.
The high court had passed the order on a plea by a Dehradun-based NGO.
After the last year's order, the NGO had filed a plea in the high court alleging non-compliance of the order.
Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.
The apex court said that the high court ought to have appointed an amicus curiae in the absence of counsel, adding that "the liberty of a citizen cannot be taken away in this manner".
AIFF approaches Supreme Court seeking extension of executive committee's tenure until finalisation of new constitution
The Supreme Court in a 2017 order had appointed a Committee of Administrators to formulate the constitution of the AIFF in consonance with the Sports Code.
A two-judge bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee pulled up the Maharashtra government over the TV anchor's arrest as they heard the petition through video conferencing.