Right to privacy: Nine-judge Supreme Court bench begins hearing on issue of fundamental rights

A nine-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday began hearing arguments to determine whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right.

PTI July 19, 2017 12:24:54 IST
Right to privacy: Nine-judge Supreme Court bench begins hearing on issue of fundamental rights

New Delhi: A nine-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday began hearing arguments to determine whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

Senior advocate Gopal Subramanium initiated the hearing before the bench headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar saying that the rights to life and liberty are pre-existing natural rights.

Right to privacy Ninejudge Supreme Court bench begins hearing on issue of fundamental rights

Representational image. AFP

The nine-judge bench also comprises Justices J Chelameswar, SA Bobde, RK Agrawal, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Abhay Manohar Sapre, DY Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer.

The bench is dealing with the limited issue of right to privacy and matters challenging the Aadhaar scheme would be referred back to a smaller bench.

There are some preambular values which are to be read with fundamental rights, Subramanium said.

The preamble has multiplicity of expressions which include some from American Constitution and some from continental countries, he added.

"Liberty is the fundamental value of our Constitution. Life and liberty are natural existing rights which our Constitution has. Now can liberty be at all experienced without privacy. Can liberty be exercised without privacy at least with regard to all the Fundamental Rights of the Constitution," he said.

The hearing is in progress.

The apex court had on Tuesday set up the Constitution bench after the matter was referred to a larger bench by a five-judge bench.

The five-judge Constitution bench, headed by the CJI, which was to deal with pleas challenging the validity of the Aadhaar scheme and the right to privacy attached to it, was faced with the two past verdicts, delivered in 1950 and 1962 by larger benches, holding that the right to privacy was not a fundamental right.

The apex court had said the nine-judge bench would deal with the limited issue of right to privacy and the correctness of the two judgements.

A three-judge bench had in 2015 referred to a larger bench a batch of pleas, including the one filed by Justice (retd) KS Puttaswamy, challenging the validity of the Aadhaar scheme and the aspect of right to privacy attached to it.

The apex court had agreed to set up a bench on 12 July to deal with Aadhaar-related matters after the attorney general and senior advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for petitioners, had jointly mentioned the matter.

The petitioners had claimed that collection and sharing of biometric information, as required under the scheme, was a breach of the "fundamental" right to privacy.

Allowing the Centre's plea, the court had framed various questions, including whether right to privacy was a fundamental right, to be decided by a Constitution bench.

Updated Date:

also read

PM security breach: Punjab BJP chief rejects probe, calls CM Channi 'ringleader of conspiracy'
India

PM security breach: Punjab BJP chief rejects probe, calls CM Channi 'ringleader of conspiracy'

Earlier, a delegation led by Ashwani Sharma met Governor Banwarilal Purohit over the issue

Supreme Court to hear plea seeking probe into security lapses during Narendra Modi's Punjab visit
India

Supreme Court to hear plea seeking probe into security lapses during Narendra Modi's Punjab visit

Lawyer's Voice, which has filed the plea, has sought an urgent hearing on the case stating that a professional and efficient investigation is needed to ensure it doesn't happen again

NEET PG Counselling: Supreme Court to give order on EWS case today, a look at what the case is all about
India

NEET PG Counselling: Supreme Court to give order on EWS case today, a look at what the case is all about

The matter pending before the court has been filed by resident doctors who have challenged a 29 July 2021 notification by the Centre introducing 27 percent OBC quota and 10 percent EWS quota in the NEET all-India quota seats