In a 9-0 verdict, Supreme Court says right to privacy is a Fundamental Right: Highlights from judgment

The Supreme Court on Thursday declared to right to privacy as a Fundamental right under the Constitution.

FP Staff August 24, 2017 11:40:41 IST
In a 9-0 verdict, Supreme Court says right to privacy is a Fundamental Right: Highlights from judgment

The Supreme Court on Thursday declared to right to privacy as a Fundamental right under the Constitution. A nine-judge constitutional bench headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar ruled that right to privacy is protected intrinsically as part of rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Delivering the verdict, the bench observed that privacy is protected under Article 21 and Part 3 of the Indian Constitution.

In a 90 verdict Supreme Court says right to privacy is a Fundamental Right Highlights from judgment

Representational image.

The ruling will have a bearing on 24 other cases challenging the validity of the Aadhaar scheme on the grounds of it violating the right to privacy. Others members of the bench comprising Justice J Chelameswar, Justice S A Bobde, Justice R K Agrawal, Justice R F Nariman, Justice A M Sapre, D Y Chandrachud, S K Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer also shared the same view.

Reading out the "operative portion" of the judgment, Khehar made following observations:

- Decision in MP Sharma case overruled.
- Decision in Kharak Singh case, to the extent it says Right to Privacy is not part of Right to Life, is overruled
- Right to Privacy is an intrinsic part of life and personal liberty under Article 21.
- Decisions subsequent to the Kharak Singh case verdict which held privacy as part of right to life are correct.
- A number of writ petitions were tagged along with Justice K Puttaswamy’s petition on Aadhaar, which led to the constitution of this 9 Judge Bench. A slew of Senior Advocates had appeared for various parties in the case.

Here is the full text of the judgment in the case:

Part 1:

Part 2:

Click here to follow live updates on the Supreme Court verdict

Updated Date:

also read

Neither a saboteur nor a sage: Governor is a constitutional functionary who needs to be solely loyal to the Constitution
Opinion

Neither a saboteur nor a sage: Governor is a constitutional functionary who needs to be solely loyal to the Constitution

Governors need to act true to their conscience and Constitution. That will take care of the dignity of their office

Why Collegium needs urgent reform: Judiciary should be independent as well as accountable
Opinion

Why Collegium needs urgent reform: Judiciary should be independent as well as accountable

One hopes the current confrontation between the executive and the judiciary proves to be a blessing in disguise and ushers in much-needed progressive reforms in the judiciary

In a major setback, Google loses bid to block India's Android antitrust ruling
World

In a major setback, Google loses bid to block India's Android antitrust ruling

A three-judge panel led by Chief Justice Chandrachud decided against blocking the CCI’s antitrust ruling that would require Google to change the way it markets Android in India. The Supreme Court also upheld the $161 million penalty imposed on Google.