Haryana government tells SC it will maintain status quo on Yamuna water supply till 21 May

The Haryana government told the Supreme Court it would maintain status quo on the supply of Yamuna river water to Delhi till 21 May

PTI May 16, 2018 15:34:40 IST
Haryana government tells SC it will maintain status quo on Yamuna water supply till 21 May

New Delhi: The Haryana government told the Supreme Court it would maintain status quo on the supply of Yamuna river water to Delhi till 21 May. The apex court asked the Delhi government and the Delhi Jal Board (DJB) to request Haryana for the maintenance of status quo on water supply and directed Haryana to take an independent decision on the matter.

Haryana government tells SC it will maintain status quo on Yamuna water supply till 21 May

File image of Supreme Court. AFP

A bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Navin Sinha said the Upper Yamuna River Board (UYRB) should deal with the issue and it would be appropriate if the Delhi government approached the Board. The Delhi government withdrew a plea filed by the DJB in the apex court and said it would approach the Board immediately for release and continuation of drinking water supply from Haryana.

The court was hearing the DJB's plea alleging that Haryana had reduced by one-third the supply of Yamuna water to the national capital, leading to a grave water crisis. "We expect the Board to meet and sort out the matter amicably between Delhi and Haryana," the bench observed.

One of the functions of the UYRB, set up by the Centre in 1995, was to regulate and supply water from all storage sites and barrages up to the Okhla barrage in Delhi, in accordance with the agreements between the governments of the six basin states of Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan and Delhi.

On May 11, the apex court had slammed the UYRB for not doing their job pertaining to distribution of river water among the beneficiary states and asked it why should the courts do its work. Haryana government had earlier told the top court that it was facing a "huge distress" for water as it was receiving only half the supply from Hathni Kund barrage located in the Yamuna Nagar district. Haryana had, however, said it would continue supplying 150 cusecs of water to Delhi till 15 May.

Delhi earlier said there was a shortfall of 120 cusecs of water of Yamuna river daily for the national capital. The DJB had contended that Haryana was supplying Delhi only 330 cusecs of water daily as against 450 cusecs a day, which was agreed upon between the state and the Union Territory. It had claimed that due to curtailment in water supply to Wazirabad reservoir, the plant was running at reduced capacity leading to a "grave water crisis" in the city.

The DJB had sought directions from the apex court to Haryana to supply the entire 450 cusec of water per day continuously and daily to the Wazirabad reservoir.

Updated Date:

also read

Explained: Why Yash Raj Films was asked to compensate viewer for not including 'promo song' in the film Fan
Entertainment

Explained: Why Yash Raj Films was asked to compensate viewer for not including 'promo song' in the film Fan

The Supreme Court stayed the NCDRC order asking YRF to compensate complainant who felt 'cheated' by the exclusion of 'Jabra Fan' from Shah Rukh Khan's 2016 film. But it also upheld the exclusion of 'promotional' songs from films as "unfair trade practice."

Centre submits detailed affidavit on issuance of COVID death certificate in SC
India

Centre submits detailed affidavit on issuance of COVID death certificate in SC

As per the affidavit, deaths due to poisoning, suicide, homicide and accident, among others, will not be considered as COVID-19 deaths, even if COVID-19 is an accompanying condition

Not going to reopen cases on grant of reservation to SCs and STs, states to decide on implementation: Supreme Court
India

Not going to reopen cases on grant of reservation to SCs and STs, states to decide on implementation: Supreme Court

Taking up pleas pertaining to alleged hurdles in granting reservation in promotions to SCs and STs, a three-judge bench directed the Advocate on Records of states to identify and flag unique issues