Delhi HC seeks Centre's response on plea against marital rape

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday asked the central government to file its response to a bunch of petitions challenging the exception in law that protects a husband from being tried for the rape of his wife.

IANS July 18, 2017 22:10:24 IST
Delhi HC seeks Centre's response on plea against marital rape

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday asked the central government to file its response to a bunch of petitions challenging the exception in law that protects a husband from being tried for the rape of his wife.

Delhi HC seeks Centres response on plea against marital rape

Representational image. AFP

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar asked the advocate representing men's rights activists, who are opposing the petitions, if domestic violence had penal circumstances, "How do you justify the exception?"

The bench was hearing petitions filed by NGO RIT Foundation, All India Democratic Women's Association and a marital rape victim, challenging the exception to rape under Section 375 and Section 376B as unconstitutional.

The plea challenged the Indian Penal Code's Section 375, saying it does not consider sexual intercourse of a man with his wife as rape.

Section 375, which defines "rape", also contains the exception provision which states that the rape law would not apply to assault or sexual intercourse by a husband on his wife over 15 years of age. Section 376B deals with sexual intercourse by a man with his wife during separation.

One of the petitions also challenges Section 198B of the Criminal Procedure Code, which states that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 376B of the IPC where the persons are in a marital relationship.

Senior counsel Colin Gonsalves, appearing for one of the petitioners, provided a list of 51 countries which have criminalised marital rape. The advocate said even Nepal, a Hindu state, framed laws against marital rape way back in 2002.

The advocate said that the prevailing law excluded marital rape as a criminal offence and that these sections were violative of the rights of married women.

According to the petitioners, the law as it stands today amounts to a state-sanctioned licence granted to the husband to violate the sexual autonomy of his lawfully wedded wife and is therefore, a violation of the Right to Privacy guaranteed to the wife under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Earlier, the central government had told the high court that if marital rape was brought under law, "the entire family system will be under great stress". The Centre said the issue "deals exclusively with private affairs of husband-wife based on traditional social structure and hence can't be said to be unconstitutional".

The court has now posted the matter for 28 August.

Updated Date:

Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro at ₹499 for the first year. Use code PRO499. Limited period offer. *T&C apply

also read

Coronavirus News Updates: Delhi HC questions controlled vaccination drive; Maharashtra, Kerala continue to see upsurge in cases
India

Coronavirus News Updates: Delhi HC questions controlled vaccination drive; Maharashtra, Kerala continue to see upsurge in cases

Maharashtra also displayed a rise in active cases in 24 hrs followed by Punjab, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana and Gujarat, the health ministry said

'Only husband and wife make a family': Centre opposes same-sex marriage in Delhi HC
India

'Only husband and wife make a family': Centre opposes same-sex marriage in Delhi HC

The affidavit comes after four people from the gay and lesbian community urged the court to declare that marriages between any two persons irrespective of their sex be solemnised under the Special Marriage Act

By enforcing notices under SMA, govt telling interfaith couples to convert or wait endlessly, says petitioner Nida Rehman
India

By enforcing notices under SMA, govt telling interfaith couples to convert or wait endlessly, says petitioner Nida Rehman

Notices of marriages under SMA intended to safeguard the interests of the two parties to the marriage, but for some years, they have been used to prevent, often forcibly, inter-faith and inter-caste marriages