 "Chhattisgarh High Court rules that woman can’t be forced to undergo virginity test")
A state high court in India has ruled that a woman can’t be forced to undergo a virginity test, arguing it would violate her fundamental rights enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Chhattisgarh High Court noted that granting such a permission would be against the principles of natural justice
The ruling by Justice Arvind Kumar Verma came in response to a criminal petition filed by a man who demanded his wife’s virginity test, alleging she was in an illicit relationship with another man, challenging a family court’s order dated October 15, 2024, which rejected the interim application.
The wife, on the other hand, had claimed that her husband was impotent and refused to cohabit.
The HC instead suggested the petitioner to undergo the concerned medical test or produce any other evidence to prove that the allegations of impotency have no base.
“He cannot possibly be permitted to subject the wife to undergo her virginity test and fill up the lacuna in his evidence”.
It must be noted that the order was passed in January but has only recently been made public.
The high court noted that the contention of the petitioner demanding a virginity test of his wife is unconstitutional as it violates Article 21 of the Constitution, which includes the right tothe dignity of women.
“Article 21 of the Constitution of India not only guarantees the right to life and personal liberty but also the right to live with dignity, which is crucial for women.
Impact Shorts
More Shorts“No woman can be forced to conduct her virginity test. It is a violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21. It has to be borne in mind that Article 21 is the ‘heart of fundamental rights’,” the high court stated.
Justice Verma further said that the virginity test is a violation of the basic right of women to be treated with decency and proper dignity.
“The right to personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 is non-derogable and cannot be tinkered with in any manner. The petitioner cannot possibly be permitted to subject the wife to undergo her virginity test and fill up the lacuna in his evidence in this regard.
“Be that as it may, but in any case, granting the permission for virginity test of the respondent would be against her fundamental rights, the cardinal principles of natural justice and secret modesty of a female,” the high court noted.
Non-derogable human rights refer to rights that are absolute and may not be subject to any derogation, even in times of war or emergency.
The bench further observed that the allegations made by both parties against each other are the subject matter of evidence and a conclusion can be drawn only after evidence.
“The High Court is of the considered opinion that the order impugned is neither illegal nor perverse and there is no judicial error committed by the trial court,” it said.
The couple got married on April 30, 2023, as per Hindu rites. They lived together at the husband’s family residence in Korba district.
The wife allegedly told her family members that her husband is impotent and she refused to establish a marital relationship or cohabit with her husband, the petitioner’s counsel said.
She filed an interim application on July 2, 2024, under section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) before the family court in Raigarh district seeking maintenance of Rs 20,000 from her husband.
In response to the maintenance claim interim application, the petitioner sought a virginity test of his wife alleging that she was in an illicit relationship with her brother-in-law. He claimed the marriage was never consummated.
On October 15, 2024, the family court in Raigarh rejected the husband’s request following which he filed a criminal petition in the High Court.
The case is currently at evidence stage in the family court.
(With inputs from PTI)
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
