Bombay HC directs release of three sex workers, says adult women have right to choose vocation
A bench of Justice Prithviraj Chavan said that prostitution had not been considered a criminal offence under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956
Mumbai: Observing that prostitution was not a criminal offence under the law, and that an adult woman had the right to choose her vocation, the Bombay High Court has ordered immediate release of three women sex workers detained at a state corrective institution in Mumbai.
In an order passed on Thursday, a bench of Justice Prithviraj Chavan said that prostitution had not been considered a criminal offence under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.
He said that prostitution by itself was not an offence and did not entail a punishment. Instead, its public solicitation was the offence defined under the Act.
Justice Chavan was hearing a plea filed by the three women challenging an order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Mazgaon, that had upheld their detention at a local correctional facility against their will.
As per the HC order, the women, all in their twenties, were picked up by the police in September last year following a raid at a guest house.
The middleman was arrested and booked under the Act. The three women were held as "victims" and sent to the correctional facility.
Subsequently, the mothers and other legal guardians of the three women approached the magistrate''s court seeking their custody.
The magistrate however, declined to give their custody to their guardians.
Justice Chavan, however, set aside the magistrate''s order.
He said that the women were "adults," and "entitled to their fundamental right to move freely and choose their own vocation".
The high court held that since the womenwere not being prosecuted under the law, there was no question of continuing their detention at the correctional home.
"Even otherwise, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 does not empower the Magistrate to hold the custody of the victims beyond the period of three weeks without there being any final order to that effect after following due process of law," the HC said.
It further said that there was nothing on record to show that the petitioners were seducing any person for the purpose of prostitution or that they were running a brothel.
"There is no provision under the law, which makes prostitution per se a criminal offence or punishes a person because he indulges in prostitution," it said.
"What is punishable under the Act is sexual exploitation or abuse of a person for commercial purpose and to earn the bread thereby. And where a person is carrying on prostitution in a public place or when a person is found soliciting or seducing another person as defined under the Act," the court said.
The former editor-in-chief of Tehelka magazine stands accused of sexually assaulting his then woman colleague in the lift of a five-star hotel in Goa in November 2013
In August 2013, a 22-year-old photojournalist was gang-raped inside Shakti Mills in Mumbai. Later, an eighteen-year-old call centre employee reported that she too had been gang-raped, on 31 July 2013, inside the same mills complex.
Shakti Mills gang-rape case: Bombay HC sets aside death penalty, sends three accused to life imprisonment
The trio, through their lawyer, had told the court the death sentence violated their fundamental right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution