Ayodhya verdict: Supreme Court says underlying structure below disputed site was not an Islamic structure

The SC said the underlying structure below the disputed site at Ayodhya was not an Islamic structure, but the ASI has not established whether a temple was demolished to build a mosque.

Press Trust of India November 09, 2019 11:29:51 IST
Ayodhya verdict: Supreme Court says underlying structure below disputed site was not an Islamic structure
  • The SC said the underlying structure below the disputed site at Ayodhya was not an Islamic structure, but the ASI has not established whether a temple was demolished to build a mosque.

  • The observation by a 5-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, was made in its verdict in the politically sensitive case of Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya.

  • The bench, also comprising Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer, further said that terming the archaeological evidence as merely an opinion would be a great disservice to the Archaeological Survey of India.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Saturday said the underlying structure below the disputed site at Ayodhya was not an Islamic structure, but the ASI has not established whether a temple was demolished to build a mosque.

Ayodhya verdict Supreme Court says underlying structure below disputed site was not an Islamic structure

Representational image. Reuters

The observation by a 5-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, was made in its verdict in the politically sensitive case of Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya.

The bench, also comprising Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer, further said that terming the archaeological evidence as merely an opinion would be a great disservice to the Archaeological Survey of India.

CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES ON THE AYODHYA VERDICT

The court also said that the Hindus consider the disputed site as the birthplace of Lord Ram and even Muslims say this about that place.

The faith of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the demolished structure is undisputed, the apex court said.

The bench said the existence of Sita Rasoi, Ram Chabutra and Bhandar grih are the testimony of the religious fact of the place.

The apex court, however, said that the title cannot be established on the ground of faith, belief and they are only an indicator for deciding the dispute.

Updated Date:

also read

NCP to contest Assembly polls in Goa, UP, Manipur, says Sharad Pawar
India

NCP to contest Assembly polls in Goa, UP, Manipur, says Sharad Pawar

Slamming Uttar Pradesh Chief minister Yogi Adityanath over his '80 percent versus 20 percent' remarks, Pawar said the chief minister should take along all sections of society

Seven decades after Independence, temples still fighting for freedom
Politics

Seven decades after Independence, temples still fighting for freedom

Why #FreeHinduTemples should not just be a poll-bound promise from the BJP

UP Assembly polls: Not three-fourth seats, BJP meant it will get 3 or 4 seats, says Akhilesh Yadav
India

UP Assembly polls: Not three-fourth seats, BJP meant it will get 3 or 4 seats, says Akhilesh Yadav

Yadav was taking a swipe at BJP's "80 versus 20" assertion. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had recently said that in the Assembly elections, while 80 percent supporters will be on one side, 20 percent will be on the other