Aadhar data collection by private agencies not good idea, says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to expedite the hearing of Aadhar cases challenging the constitutional validity of the scheme but observed that data collection by private agencies is not a good idea.

PTI January 05, 2017 16:06:11 IST
Aadhar data collection by private agencies not good idea, says Supreme Court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to expedite the hearing of Aadhar cases challenging the constitutional validity of the scheme but observed that data collection by private agencies is not a good idea.

A bench headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar made the remarks after senior advocate Shyam Divan sought urgent hearing of the plea citing privacy concern.

Aadhar data collection by private agencies not good idea says Supreme Court

Supreme Court. Reuters

"We are not inclined to give immediate hearing as there are limited resources but biometric data collection by private agencies is not a great idea," the bench also comprising Justices NV Ramana and DY Chandrachud said.

Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, said that these matters needs urgent hearing as there is individual's privacy concern as biometric datas are being collected by private agencies.

The apex court had on 15 October 2015 lifted its earlier restrictions and permitted voluntary use of Aadhar cards in welfare schemes that also included MGNREGA, all pension schemes and provident fund, besides ambitious flagship programmes like 'Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojna' of the NDA government.

The social welfare schemes, aimed at reaching the door steps of the "poorest of the poor", were in addition to LPG and PDS schemes in which the apex court had allowed the voluntary use of Aadhar cards.

A five-judge constitution bench had put a caveat in its interim order for the Centre and said that Aadhar card scheme is purely voluntary and not mandatory till the matter is finally decided by this court, this way or the other way.

It had said that that a larger bench was required to be set up for final disposal of the petitions that also include the question as to whether the right to privacy is fundamental right.

A three-judge bench had on 11 August 2015 referred a batch of petitions, challenging the Aadhar card scheme, to a larger bench for an authoritative view on the question as to whether the right to privacy is fundamental right or not and had also restricted the use of Aadhar to PDS and LPG scheme only.

UIDAI, established by UPA-II in 2009, issues Aadhar cards to the citizens.

Under the programme, every citizen is to be provided a 12-digit unique identification number for which biometric information is collected.

Updated Date:

also read

SC restrains son from dealing in properties of 89-year-old mother suffering from dementia
India

SC restrains son from dealing in properties of 89-year-old mother suffering from dementia

This comes after the bench took serious note of the fact that the son took his mother who is also virtually immobile to a registrar's office in Motihari, Bihar, to get her thumb impression to allegedly sell off her properties worth Rs 2 crore

Centre may amend sedition law instead of revoking it: Mahua Moitra
Politics

Centre may amend sedition law instead of revoking it: Mahua Moitra

Her comment came a day after Supreme Court in a landmark order put on hold the controversial sedition law till the Centre completes a promised review of the colonial relic and also asked the central and state governments not to register any fresh case invoking the act

Supreme Court puts sedition law on hold: A look back at cases that shook the nation
India

Supreme Court puts sedition law on hold: A look back at cases that shook the nation

The colonial-era sedition law has been invoked against the likes of author Arundhati Roy, student leaders Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, and cartoonist Aseem Trivedi among others