U.S. panel launches trade secret theft probe into China steel | Reuters

WASHINGTON The U.S. International Trade Commission said on Thursday it launched an investigation into complaints by United States Steel Corp ( X.N ) that Chinese competitors stole its trade secrets, fixed prices and misrepresented the origin of their exports to the United States. The ITC said in a statement that it has not made any decisions on the merits of the case.

Reuters May 27, 2016 04:15:07 IST
U.S. panel launches trade secret theft probe into China steel
| Reuters

US panel launches trade secret theft probe into China steel
 Reuters

WASHINGTON The U.S. International Trade Commission said on Thursday it launched an investigation into complaints by United States Steel Corp (X.N) that Chinese competitors stole its trade secrets, fixed prices and misrepresented the origin of their exports to the United States.

The ITC said in a statement that it has not made any decisions on the merits of the case. U.S. Steel, in its complaint under section 337 of the main U.S. tariff law, is seeking to halt nearly all imports from China's largest steel producers and trading houses.

The commission identified 40 Chinese steel makers and distribution subsidiaries as respondents, including Baosteel 60019.SS, Hebei Iron and Steel Group (000709.SZ), Wuhan Iron and Steel Co Ltd (600005.SS), Anshan Iron and Steel Group and Jiangsu Shagang Group.

The probe comes amid a barrage of efforts by the U.S. Commerce Department to clamp down on a glut of Chinese steel imports, including steep anti-dumping duties corrosion-resistant steel announced on Wednesday.

U.S. Steel filed its original complaint a month ago, alleging that it was a victim of a 2011 computer hacking incident that also prompted U.S. federal cyber-espionage indictments against five Chinese military officials in 2014.

The iconic Pittsburgh-based steelmaker alleged the hackers stole research data on production techniques for a new generation of lightweight, high-strength steel now favoured by automakers. It said this accelerated Chinese competitor Baosteel's ability to replicate the product, which took U.S. Steel a decade to develop.

Baosteel, the second-largest steelmaker in China and fourth-largest in the world, responded by saying the charges were "rootless speculation and subjective assumption and could even be described as an absurd statement.".

U.S. Steel Chairman Mario Longhi applauded the ITC's decision to investigate the company's claims, which also allege that Chinese producers falsely named other countries as the origin of their products and illegally transhipped them through third countries to avoid anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties.

"We remain confident that the evidence will prove the Chinese steel producers engaged in collusion, theft and fraud and we will aggressively seek to stop those responsible for these illegal trade actions," Longhi said in a statement.

Such intellectual property-based claims have only been made once before by U.S. steel producers, in 1978 against 35 Japanese makers and importers of welded stainless steel pipe. But the ITC, rather than barring imports of the products from Japan, instead ordered 11 firms to stop unfair pricing practices.

(Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Alan Crosby)

This story has not been edited by Firstpost staff and is generated by auto-feed.

Updated Date:

also read

Should internet giants pay for news? All about the debate and the global experience so far
News & Analysis

Should internet giants pay for news? All about the debate and the global experience so far

Here's a look at how countries have gone about getting big tech to pay up for news content.

US antitrust overhaul: What it means for the likes of Amazon, Apple, Facebook; how it would change big tech
News & Analysis

US antitrust overhaul: What it means for the likes of Amazon, Apple, Facebook; how it would change big tech

Even if only some of the proposals are passed as law, they will likely have significant consequences for the way big tech does business globally.

Legal protection of Twitter as intermediary is not absolute, it is compliance-oriented
India

Legal protection of Twitter as intermediary is not absolute, it is compliance-oriented

Instead of resorting to police action, it will be best if India resolves these tech issues through an effective legal framework and regulator