Trending:

SC issues notices to Jet Airways, Sahara on sellout dispute

FP Archives December 20, 2014, 05:32:05 IST

The Supreme Court today issued notices on cross appeals by Sahara India and Jet Airways challenging a Bombay High Court order.

Advertisement
SC issues notices to Jet Airways, Sahara on sellout dispute

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today issued notices on cross appeals by Sahara India and Jet Airways challenging a Bombay High Court order directing the latter to pay a renegotiated amount instead of the original determined price for purchase of Sahara Airlines (now Jetlite) in 2007.

A bench of justices Altamas Kabir and S S Nijjar granted six weeks to the two parties to file their counter-affidavits and two weeks thereafter for the rejoinders.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

[caption id=“attachment_146858” align=“alignleft” width=“380” caption=“Sahara had contended that Jet Airways was liable to pay Rs 2,000 crore. Reuters”] [/caption]

On 17 October, the high court had upheld its earlier order by a single judge asking Jet Airways to pay nine percent interest on the balance amount of purchase price to Sahara.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice G S Godbole had dismissed appeals of Sahara India and Jet Airways challenging the May 5 order of the single bench of Justice DY Chandrachud.

The bench had ruled that the two appeals filed by Sahara India and Jet Airways were “not maintainable” as only an SLP was maintainable against the order of the single judge.

Earlier, Jet had given an undertaking that it will not dispose of the property during the pendency of the appeal filed by Sahara.

Sahara had contended that Jet Airways was liable to pay Rs 2,000 crore, the original buyout price, instead of the renegotiated amount of Rs 1,450 crore because the latter had defaulted in paying installments by deducting income tax dues.

Both sides had agreed to the renegotiated price on condition that Jet would not default in paying installments.

Jet Airways contended that they were not liable to pay interest on balance amount at nine per cent as they had not defaulted in payments but had only deducted income tax dues which were liable to be paid by Sahara.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

PTI

Home Video Shorts Live TV