BCCI's old guard accuses board of showing 'double standards' after suspension of Hardik Pandya, KL Rahul

Johri, the chief executive of the BCCI, had received a clean chit in the sexual harassment allegations levelled against him by two women in the wake of the #MeToo Movement.

Press Trust of India, January 12, 2019

Mumbai: Referring to the exoneration of BCCI CEO Rahul Johri in a sexual harassment case, the Board's old guard accused the current dispensation of "double standards" in dealing with cases related to players.

The members of the group met here Friday "to discuss and deliberate upon the state of affairs of the BCCI and expressed grave concern over the same".

Representational image. AFP

Representational image. AFP

The group comprised former president N Srinivasan's loyalists such as Anirudh Chaudhary and Niranjan Shah, besides representatives of 14 state units.

Taking note of the suspension slapped on Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul for their loose talk on women in a TV show, they said in a statement, "The members expressed shock at the double standards on display in dealing with issues related to players where show cause notices have been issued and the players have been suspended pending enquiry.

"... And in dealing with issues relating to the CEO who was not even suspended and in whose case the enquiry procedure adopted was arbitrary and in violation of the BCCI's constitution and in the absence of any decision from the CoA as a committee."

Johri, the chief executive of the BCCI, had received a clean chit in the sexual harassment allegations levelled against him by two women in the wake of the #MeToo Movement.

Aiming for "restoration of democracy" in the Board, this group is planning to approach the Supreme Court again with their grievances.

On the Committee of Administrators chief Vinod Rai and member Diana Edulji, they said in the statement, "The members expressed shock at the manner in which decision making was happening in the CoA where the decisions and views of one member were being ignored and the decisions of the other were being executed irregularly despite there being a deadlock in decision making on such decisions.

Updated Date: Jan 12, 2019







Top Stories

Rank Team Points Rating
1 India 5007 116
2 South Africa 4280 110
3 England 5310 108
4 New Zealand 3213 107
5 Australia 4143 101
6 Sri Lanka 4103 91
Rank Team Points Rating
1 England 6918 126
2 India 7201 120
3 New Zealand 5188 113
4 South Africa 4985 111
5 Pakistan 4370 102
6 Australia 4220 100
Rank Team Points Rating
1 Pakistan 4979 138
2 India 5298 126
3 England 2586 118
4 Australia 3266 117
5 South Africa 2502 114
6 New Zealand 2940 113