BCCI brief players on importance of anti-concussion helmets, leave decision on individuals on use of neck guard

Though it is still not mandatory, the ICC's cricket committee has extensively deliberated on the issue and come out with concussion substitutes — a change in the rules that Australia used in the form of Marnus Labuschagne in the Ashes

Press Trust of India, Aug 20, 2019 21:00:39 IST

The BCCI has briefed its players on the importance of wearing anti-concussion helmets but left the decision to use neck guard on the cricketers despite growing calls to make it mandatory.

BCCI brief players on importance of anti-concussion helmets, leave decision on individuals on use of neck guard

Shikhar Dhawan pictured whilst wearing a neck guard. Reuters

Compulsory neck guards on helmets for Australian cricketers are "not far away", the national team's sports medicine chief said on Monday after a Jofra Archer snorter felled Steve Smith during the second Ashes Test.

Though it is still not mandatory, the ICC's cricket committee has extensively deliberated on the issue and come out with concussion substitutes — a change in the rules that has been welcomed by all and one that Australia effectively used in the form of Marnus Labuschagne in the second Ashes Test.

"Once the new rules on concussions came into effect, the BCCI briefed the captain as well as the coaching staff about it. We have told them about helmets with anti-concussion element — neck guards. A few players including Shikhar Dhawan use it but we can't force them. Wearing a helmet is also about a matter of comfort," a senior BCCI official, privy to the development, told PTI.

The official informed that after the Phill Hughes tragedy, the BCCI had asked its players to speak to their respective helmet suppliers to design a more protective headgear.

"But helmet is something that a player should be comfortable with. Some players may find it difficult to manoeuvre or feel a bit discomfort around the neck region. Till ICC doesn't make it mandatory, I believe we should leave it up to the players," he said.

"I think it (helmets with neck guards) should be (mandatory)," Peter Brukner, a former doctor of the Australian cricket team from 2012-2017, told The Australian newspaper.

However, some of the former and current Indian players feel that it cannot be made mandatory based on Smith's technique only.

"I would always listen to what Sunil Gavaskar has to say with regards to playing short balls. Watch the ball till last moment. But the odd delivery will hit you. It's all about the technique. Look at the bowlers of yesteryears. Michael Holding, Malcolm Marshall, Imran Khan and in our time Shoaib Akhtar, Brett Lee. They were all quick," said senior off-spinner Harbhajan Singh.

"You can't tell a youngster to copy Steve Smith's technique. It's very unique and very effective. But for him only. Also, every team doesn't have a Jofra Archer-like bowler. It could be against a team with medium pacers on Feroz Shah Kotla. Why do you need a neck guard there," Harbhajan asked.

Former India 'keeper Deep Dasgupta spoke on how each player preferred a different helmet.

"Sachin Tendulkar used to wear 'Forma' helmets and Virat (Kohli) does the same. Rahul (Dravid) used to wear CMD while a lot of players use 'Masuri' helmets.

"I can tell you when I used CMD, I would have some discomfort near my neck region as the side grill of the visor would graze it. But Masuri had a wider base and I felt comfortable. So it's an individual choice," Dasgupta said.

Updated Date: Aug 20, 2019 21:00:39 IST






Rank Team Points Rating
1 India 4027 115
2 New Zealand 2829 109
3 South Africa 2917 108
4 England 3778 105
5 Australia 2640 98
6 Sri Lanka 3795 95
Rank Team Points Rating
1 England 6745 125
2 India 7071 122
3 New Zealand 4837 112
4 Australia 5543 111
5 South Africa 5193 110
6 Pakistan 4756 97
Rank Team Points Rating
1 Pakistan 7365 283
2 England 4253 266
3 South Africa 4196 262
4 India 8099 261
5 Australia 5471 261
6 New Zealand 4784 252