Cricket

BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary questions CoA's handling of alleged sexual harassment case against CEO Rahul Johri

Rahul Johri has already replied to a show cause notice served to him by the CoA, in which he has categorically denied all allegations levelled against him.

BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary questions CoA's handling of alleged sexual harassment case against CEO Rahul Johri

New Delhi: The BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary Saturday questioned the Committee of Administrators (CoA) for dealing with the alleged sexual harassment case against CEO Rahul Johri in the "most cavalier manner".

The CoA has constituted a three-member independent panel comprising former Allahabad high court judge Justice Rakesh Sharma, former Delhi Commission of Women (DCW) chairperson Barkha Singh and former CBI director PC Sharma to probe the allegations levelled against Johri.

File image of BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary. AFP

File image of BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary. AFP

Johri has already replied to a show cause notice served to him by the CoA, in which he has categorically denied all allegations levelled against him.

The former IPS officer from Jharkhand also questioned the formation of the new panel.

"The Committee of Administrators was constituted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as a four-member body and one of the members of the said committee was made the chairman to convene its meetings and preside over them," Choudhary wrote in an e-mail, which is in possession of PTI.

"The position of the Chairman was only that of first among equals and no additional or superior powers had or have been conferred upon the Chairman by the Hon'ble Supreme Court," Choudhary wrote.

Choudhary then cited the differences in opinion between Vinod Rai and Diana Edulji, who held contrasting views on how the case should be handled.

While Edulji was in favour of sacking Johri, Rai wanted further probe as he didn't want the CEO to be denied "natural justice".

The acting secretary wrote, "Presently, the committee comprises two members and both members are equal in status for all purposes. That being so, the Learned Chairman has no power or authority to prevail over the views of the other esteemed member and take decisions unilaterally on behalf of the CoA or on behalf of the BCCI."

"A committee stricken with such infirmities from its inception is hardly expected to dispense any real justice and is bound to be seen with great suspicion," he said.

"The undersigned most humbly desires that a solution be immediately be found in view of the points noted above.

Updated Date: October 28, 2018 10:30:01 IST

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Supreme Court adjourns hearing of petitions challenging CAA to19 September
India

Supreme Court adjourns hearing of petitions challenging CAA to19 September

The pleas against the CAA first came up for hearing in the Supreme Court on 18 December 2019

Supreme Court appoints Justice L Nageswara Rao for amending constitution of IOA
Sports

Supreme Court appoints Justice L Nageswara Rao for amending constitution of IOA

A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud asked Justice Rao to prepare a road map for amending the constitution and holding elections by December 15, 2022

Supreme Court bench expresses displeasure over new case listing system introduced by Chief Justice UU Lalit
India

Supreme Court bench expresses displeasure over new case listing system introduced by Chief Justice UU Lalit

The new listing system is not giving adequate time to take up matters fixed for hearing like the present case as there are number of matters within the span of an afternoon session, said a bench headed by Sanjay Kishan Kaul