Why is US Army slashing 24,000 jobs? Will it hurt the military?

The US army is cutting back.

The development comes as US generals look to restructure the army to fight battles of tomorrow.

It also comes as the three main branches of US military failed to meet their recruitment targets yet again.

But what do we know about the job cuts? And will it hurt the military?

Let’s take a closer look:

What do we know about the job cuts?

The US Army is slashing the size of its force by around 24,000.

That’s around five per cent of its size.

Around 3,000 cuts will be to the US army’s special operations forces.

According to The New York Times, the changes are part of the US’ defence strategy started under then president Donald Trump.

The Biden administration has continued the strategy which recognises threats from Russia and China

Army leaders said they looked carefully across the board at all the service’s job specialties in search of places to trim. And they examined the ongoing effort to modernise the Army, with new high-tech weapons, to determine where additional forces should be focused.

Quick Reads

View All

Was Alex Pretti holding a gun when he was shot down by federal agents?

Republic Day 2026: How a military parade became India’s R-Day tradition

According to the plan, the army will cut about 10,000 spaces for engineers and similar jobs that were tied to counter-insurgency missions. An additional 2,700 cuts will come from units that don’t deploy often and can be trimmed, and 6,500 will come from various training and other posts.

There also will be about 10,000 posts cut from cavalry squadrons, Stryker brigade combat teams, infantry brigade combat teams and security force assistance brigades, which are used to train foreign forces.

Army secretary Christine Wormuth said she and General Randy George, the US Army chief, worked to thin out the number of places where they had empty or excess slots.

“We’re moving away from counterterrorism and counterinsurgency. We want to be postured for large-scale combat operations,” Wormuth told reporters on Tuesday. “So we looked at where were there pieces of force structure that were probably more associated with counterinsurgency, for example, that we don’t need anymore.”

George added that army leaders did a lot of analysis to choose the places to cut.

“The things that we want to not have in our formation are actually things that we don’t think are going to make us successful on the battlefield going forward,” he said.

Forbes quoted the army as saying its plan would “generate new capabilities and re-balance its force structure.”

It said the plan was a result of the “rigorous assessment of its force structure.”

According to an army document, the service is “significantly over structured” and there aren’t enough soldiers to fill existing units.

The cuts, it said, are “spaces” not “faces” and the army will not be asking soldiers to leave the force.

Instead, the decision reflects the reality that for years the Army hasn’t been able to fill thousands of empty posts.

While the army as it’s currently structured can have up to 494,000 soldiers, the total number of active-duty soldiers right now is about 445,000.

Under the new plan, the goal is to bring in enough troops over the next five years to reach a level of 470,000.

Will it hurt the military?

No.

The cuts will made mostly to posts that are vacant.

These include counterinsurgency jobs which needed to be filled during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but are less essential today.

“The army is not asking current soldiers to leave. As the army builds back end strength over the next few years, most installations will likely see an increase in the number of soldiers actually stationed there,” the army said in a statement as per Fox News.

In fact, the plan calls for adding around 7,500 troops in other critical missions, including air-defence and counter-drone units and five new task forces around the world with enhanced cyber, intelligence and long-range strike capabilities.

The planned overhaul comes after two decades of war in Iraq and Afghanistan that forced the army to quickly and dramatically expand in order to fill the brigades sent to the battlefront.

That included a massive counterinsurgency mission to battle Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the Islamic State group.

Over time the military’s focus has shifted to great power competition from adversaries such as China and Russia, and threats from Iran and North Korea.

And the war in Ukraine has shown the need for greater emphasis on air-defence systems and high-tech abilities both to use and counter airborne and sea-based drones.

The changes represent a significant shift for the army to prepare for large-scale combat operations against more sophisticated enemies. But they also underscore the steep recruiting challenges that all of the military services are facing.

In the last fiscal year, which ended 30 September, the navy, army and air force all failed to meet their recruitment goals, while the marine corps and the tiny space force met their targets.

Fox News reported that the military fell 41,000 recruits short of its goal in 2023.

The army brought in a bit more than 50,000 recruits, falling well short of the publicly stated “stretch goal” of 65,000.

The previous fiscal year, the army also missed its enlistment goal by 15,000. That year the goal was 60,000.

The outlet quoted military leaders testifying at the House Armed Services Committee hearing in December as saying that a competitive job market, declining eligibility and COVID-19 school closures had hampered recruitment.

In response, the service launched a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting last fall to focus more on young people who have spent time in college or are job hunting early in their careers. And it is forming a new professional force of recruiters, rather than relying on soldiers randomly assigned to the task.

In discussing the changes at the time, Wormuth acknowledged that the service hasn’t been recruiting well “for many more years than one would think from just looking at the headlines in the last 18 months.”

The service, she said, hasn’t met its annual goal for new enlistment contracts since 2014.

Army spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Rob Lodewick told Forbes the changes, which are set to take place over the next decade, “will ensure that the army can deliver trained, cohesive and lethal forces to meet future challenges in complex operational environments.”

With inputs from agencies