Mahsa Amini's death: What's changed for Iran's women a year after protest movement

Iran’s rulers continue to enforce tight public controls as the anniversary of the death of  Mahsa Amini  in the custody of the “morality police” approaches. Amini died after being arrested for allegedly breaching hijab rules. The news of her death prompted  nationwide protests , jolting the foundations of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ahead of the expected protests  on the  anniversary of her death on 16 September, the regime continues to attempt to control social media  and heighten  surveillance . But  the desire for change  has not waned among many.

Nationwide protests

The state’s reaction to the Women, Life, Freedom protests that broke out in reaction to Amini’s death has been predictably draconian. Sources suggest hundreds have been killed, a staggering nearly 30,000  detained  , and a spate of  executions  have been carried out. Just as troubling are the tales emerging from the shadows, stories of detainees facing unspeakable horrors, from torture to  rape . Although the ruling elite’s ongoing struggle to enforce the compulsory hijab appears  futile , the regime is showing  no signs of conceding . [caption id=“attachment_13129512” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] Nasibe Samsaei, an Iranian woman living in Turkey, cuts her hair during a protest following the death of Mahsa Amini, outside the Iranian consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. Reuters[/caption] The mandatory hijab, an issue for the past four decades, continues to be extremely contentious. Despite the dangers, numerous women, in acts of quiet defiance, choose to reject this  enforced code daily . Their courage is met with intensified  street patrols ,  hostile confrontations  and  looming new laws that threaten even stricter penalties. There seems to be an underlying fear within the governing circles that relinquishing control over something as ostensibly trivial as women’s hair might set a precedent, leading to a more significant  loss of control  in other areas of governance and social life. Sources suggest  that in an effort to sustain an aura of omnipotence, the regime is willing to do whatever it takes to maintain its grip on every aspect of life in Iran. The governing philosophy that would seem to lean more towards instilling fear rather than winning the hearts and minds of the people. In the face of mounting economic challenges and the fact that  one third of the population  is living in extreme poverty, the Iranian people’s resilience, honed by years of resistance and a relentless  yearning for change , this perpetual battle resembles a drawn-out war of attrition between the state and the people. But there is a deep-seated protest movement in Iran, anchored in years of  civil disobedience , symbolic actions,  resistance art  and immense sacrifice. There’s clearly still an  appetite for change . However, the path to change is fraught with obstacles. The opposition, despite its passion, is  fragmented , lacking leadership to pull together collective efforts. There are few well organised opposition parties outside the country. Over the past six months, there have been significant disputes about whether Iran should reinstate a constitutional  monarchy  or continue with a republican system. Instead of focusing on the common enemy, they disagree over what should replace the current rulers. This absence of a cohesive front makes garnering substantial international support challenging, especially when the regime leans on authoritarian allies such as  Russia  to enhance its surveillance and repressive capacities. It would appear the regime is equipped and willing to employ every available means to mute the populace, amplifying the risks and costs associated with dissent.

The reason

From its beginnings in 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran’s unaccountable and  overzealous plans  to reshape and redefine Iranian society have been opposed by many. The decades that followed saw an  increasing chasm  between the people and the regressive clerical establishment. Misuse of power,  corruption , catastrophic  economic policies  and the unabashed use of violence have methodically  whittled away  the revolutionary “allure” of the regime. Over the years, Iran has been no stranger to protests. But while the  student protests  of 1999 and the  Green movement  of 2009 were significant chapters in Iranian history, the  post-2018  period witnessed a tectonic shift. [caption id=“attachment_13129542” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] Women hold a picture of Mahsa Amini during a sit-in following her death, at Martyrs’ Square in Beirut, Lebanon. Reuters[/caption] Protests are no longer confined to urban centres – they’re nationwide, audacious and challenge the very core of the Islamic Republic’s ideology. The Women, Life, Freedom movement, with its lasting impact and international spotlight, stands as a testament to this change. In recent months,  cafes and restaurant have closed  and businesses have been accused of flouting the state’s stringent policies.  Universities  aren’t spared either. An unsettling purge is under way, with university professors being replaced by  regime loyalists , while campuses including  Tehran University  have become heavily surveilled zones. Add to this  economic conditions  that are so bad it is pushing people to suicide, and societal tensions reach a boiling point. Over the recent months leading up to the anniversary, momentum has been building. Several high-profile  opposition figures  have urged the public to seize this opportunity and once again take to the streets to defy the regime. This atmosphere of simmering unrest hasn’t escaped the regime’s notice. An  Amnesty International report  offers a glimpse into the state’s systematic harassment of families mourning their lost loved ones. Among those arrested was  Mahsa Amini’s uncle . Covering an extensive ten provinces, Amnesty’s research details human rights violations against numerous victim’s families, showing the extent of the government’s oppressive reach prior to the anniversary of Mahsa’s death. One of the significant achievements of last year’s uprising was the  shattering of pervasive fear  among the people. Despite the sombre atmosphere, violent crackdowns and execution of young protesters, the Women, Life, Freedom movement has fostered a collective courage to defy the regime. In anticipation of the anniversary,  both sides have been bracing themselves . People are gearing up for a potential resurgence of protests, while the state is preparing to suppress any sign of dissent. Many hope the political stalemate will not last indefinitely. While the move towards democracy may span years, the desperate desire for change must, surely, shift the prevailing order.