What was Kash Patel trying to say with Liverpool FC tie at Senate hearing?

FBI Director Kash Patel wore a Liverpool Football Club tie during his appearance before the US Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.

The unexpected wardrobe choice quickly drew widespread attention online, with many questioning why the head of America’s top federal law enforcement agency would choose to wear a tie bearing the logo of an English Premier League club during a high-profile congressional hearing.

The tie that caught our attention

Patel’s choice of neckwear was immediately noticeable. The tie, which prominently featured Liverpool FC’s crest, was not a typical accessory for such a serious occasion.

High-ranking government officials in the United States rarely wear ties displaying logos, whether from private companies, sports teams, or other organisations.

As soon as images from the hearing began circulating, users on X and other platforms seized on the unusual detail.

Some online commentators responded with humour or sarcasm. “Kash Patel wearing a Liverpool FC tie to his senate hearing….very professional,” one user quipped.

More from Explainers

How Kash Patel's Liverpool tie during Senate hearing created a social media stir Why is FBI's Kash Patel under fire over the Charlie Kirk case?

Others were more direct in their criticism, with one person writing, “For his first-ever congressional hearing as the FBI Director, Kash Patel chose to wear a Liverpool FC tie. Is that patriotic for supposedly the top cop of America?”

The bewilderment was not limited to neutral observers. Even fans of Liverpool expressed discomfort with the choice, with one supporter joking that seeing Patel wear the tie made them “want to rip my eyes out.”

Rival football fans also joined in, with a Chelsea supporter mocking, “To everyone that thought something about @FBIDirectorKash Patel is off or wrong, we now have a definitive answer: he’s a Liverpool (@LFC) fan. @ChelseaFC forever #GoBlues.”

Editor’s Picks

1

How Trump’s ‘War on Drugs’ buildup against Venezuela has a hidden agenda 2

London rally: Why Starmer should not ignore Tommy Robinson’s flagged message

The tie itself is currently sold on Liverpool’s official online store and is known as the club’s “heritage tie.” It retails for approximately £15 in the United Kingdom.

On Tuesday, Patel wore a version with thinner diagonal stripes and a larger, more prominent club logo at the bottom.

This differs from an earlier Liverpool tie he has been seen wearing, which featured thicker stripes and a smaller logo.

Patel’s history of wearing Liverpool ties suggests that his choice was not coincidental. He was first photographed wearing the thick-striped version on December 12, 2024, while visiting lawmakers on Capitol Hill shortly after Donald Trump’s re-election victory.

At that point, Patel was widely rumoured to be under consideration for a significant role in the incoming administration.

He wore the same tie again on April 9, 2025, during a press briefing highlighting a major federal operation that resulted in a large-scale narcotics seizure. By that time, Patel had already been appointed as FBI director.

Later that month, on April 28, 2025, Patel himself posted an image on X wearing the tie, captioning it, “#YNWA… Liverpool PL Champs.. Our good luck tie.”

#YNWA… Liverpool PL Champs ⚽️
Our good luck tie pic.twitter.com/JbobqTpTnf

— Kash Patel (@Kash_Patel) April 27, 2025

The post attracted significant engagement, garnering over 1.5 million views and more than 19,000 likes.

The phrase “YNWA” is shorthand for “You’ll Never Walk Alone,” Liverpool FC’s famous anthem and slogan.

Patel’s public acknowledgment of the tie confirmed that his association with Liverpool is not accidental.

The timing of Patel’s choice to wear the Liverpool tie may have been intentional. The hearing took place just one day before Liverpool’s opening match of the 2025-26 UEFA Champions League season.

The club is set to host Atlético Madrid at Anfield on Wednesday.

The fact that Patel now appears to own multiple Liverpool ties suggests a deliberate display of support for the club rather than a one-off wardrobe decision.

Why Kash Patel supporting Liverpool FC might not be welcomed in Liverpool itself

Liverpool FC is one of the most historically significant football clubs in England, with deep roots in the working-class culture of the city of Liverpool.

The club has long been associated with progressive values. Legendary manager Bill Shankly famously articulated Liverpool’s philosophy, stating, “I believe the only way to live and to be truly successful is by collective effort, with everyone working for each other, everyone helping each other, and everyone having a share of the rewards at the end of the day. That might be asking a lot, but it’s the way I see football and the way I see life.”

Liverpool’s history also includes a tense relationship with law enforcement, particularly stemming from the Hillsborough disaster of April 15, 1989.

During that tragedy, 97 Liverpool fans were killed in a stadium crush. In the immediate aftermath, police and authorities wrongly blamed the supporters, accusing them of hooliganism and drunken behaviour.

Subsequent investigations revealed that the disaster was caused by severe negligence on the part of law enforcement and stadium officials. The findings also exposed a deliberate cover-up by authorities who sought to deflect responsibility by misleading the public.

This legacy has left a lasting sense of mistrust between Liverpool supporters and police institutions.

For Patel, who leads the FBI in an administration known for aggressive law enforcement tactics — including large-scale immigration raids and deploying federal agents to certain US cities — the visual contrast was stark.

While Liverpool represents a tradition of scepticism toward state power, Patel symbolises the authority of the federal government.

How Kash Patel was grilled during the Senate hearing

It was Patel’s first official oversight hearing since becoming director of the FBI and came at a time of heightened scrutiny over his leadership of the bureau.

The hearing took place against a backdrop concerns about domestic violence motivated by the assassination of conservative political commentator Charlie Kirk, which occurred at a college campus in Utah just days before.

The FBI moved quickly in response to the killing, and Patel highlighted the agency’s rapid work in his opening statements. According to Patel, federal agents apprehended a suspect within 33 hours of the incident.

The suspect, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, has since been charged with aggravated murder by Utah authorities.

Law enforcement officials have described Robinson as holding a “leftist ideology,” and Patel confirmed that investigators are “running out every lead related to any allegation of broader violence.”

However, Patel’s handling of communications related to the case drew sharp criticism. Shortly after the assassination, Patel posted on social media that “the subject” was in custody.

That statement turned out to be premature, as the individual initially detained was later released when investigators determined he had no involvement.

Patel defended his actions before the Senate, arguing that his intention was to keep the public informed.

“I don’t see it as a mistake, I see it as something – working with the public to identify that there was a subject in custody,” he told the committee.

Pressed further, Patel admitted that his phrasing could have been clearer. “Could I have been more careful in my verbiage and included ‘a’ subject instead of subject? Sure,” he said.

The hearing quickly became combative, with tensions boiling over during exchanges between Patel and Democratic senators who accused him of politicising the FBI. The most dramatic moment came during a heated back-and-forth with US Senator Adam Schiff of California.

“You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate, you are a disgrace to this institution and you are an utter coward,” Patel shouted at Schiff during one particularly intense confrontation.

Schiff responded sharply, saying, “You can make an internet troll the FBI director, but he will always be an internet troll,” as the two men repeatedly spoke over each other.

Democrats pressed Patel on a range of issues, including whether he had retaliated against FBI employees perceived to be opponents of Donald Trump.

US Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island raised concerns about what he described as an “enemies list,” referring to individuals named in Patel’s 2023 book, Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth and the Battle for Our Democracy.

Whitehouse estimated that Patel had already taken some form of adverse action against 20 of the approximately 60 people mentioned in the book.

Among those reportedly facing scrutiny were former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, both of whom were central figures in the investigation into potential links between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia.

Patel categorically denied the allegation, stating, “That is an entirely inaccurate presupposition. I do not have an enemies list.”

Patel also dismissed accusations that he had directed the firing of FBI staff based on their involvement in previous investigations into Trump or the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.

“The only way, generally speaking, an individual is terminated at the FBI is if they have violated their oath of office, violated the law, or failed to uphold the standards that we need them to have at the FBI,” he explained.

Republicans on the committee, meanwhile, offered Patel strong support. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley praised Patel’s approach, contrasting it with what he described as the politically compromised leadership of Patel’s predecessor.

“It’s well understood that your predecessor left you an FBI infected with politics,” Grassley said.

Also Watch:

With inputs from agencies