How Moon missions are adding to space junk

There’s a lot of trash on the Moon right now – including nearly  100 bags of human waste – and with countries around the globe traveling  to the Moon, there’s going to be a lot more, both on the lunar surface and in Earth’s orbit. In August 2023, Russia’s  Luna-25 probe crashed into the Moon’s surface, while India’s  Chandrayann-3 mission successfully landed in the southern polar region, making India the fourth country to land on the Moon.

India’s Chandrayaan-3 lander successfully touched down on the south pole of the Moon, sparking celebrations across the country. AP Photo/Rajanish Kakade

With more countries landing on the Moon, people back on Earth will have to think about what happens to all the landers, waste and miscellaneous debris left on the lunar surface and in orbit. I’m a professor of astronomy who has written a book about the  future of space travel, articles about  our future off-Earth,  conflict in space,  space congestion and the  ethics of space exploration. Like many other space experts, I’m concerned about the lack of governance around space debris. Space is getting crowded People think of space as vast and empty, but the near-Earth environment is starting to get crowded. As many as  100 lunar missions are planned over the next decade by governments and private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin.

Near-Earth orbit is even more congested than the space between Earth and the Moon.

It’s from 160 to 885 kilometres straight up, compared with 38,6242 kilometres to the Moon. Currently there are nearly 7,700 satellites within a few hundred kilometres of the Earth. That number could grow to  several hundred thousand by 2027. Many of these satellites will be used to deliver internet to developing countries or to  monitor agriculture and  climate on Earth. Companies like SpaceX have dramatically  lowered launch costs, driving this wave of activity. “It’s going to be like an interstate highway, at rush hour in a snowstorm, with everyone driving much too fast,” space launch expert  Johnathan McDowell  told Space.com. The problem of space junk All this activity creates hazards and debris. Humans have left a lot of junk on the Moon, including spacecraft remains like rocket boosters from over  50 crashed landings, nearly  100 bags of human waste and miscellaneous objects like a feather, golf balls and boots. It adds up to around  200 tons of our trash.

Since  no one owns the Moon, no one is responsible for  keeping it clean and tidy.

The  clutter in Earth’s orbit includes defunct spacecraft, spent rocket boosters and items discarded by astronauts such as a glove, a wrench and a toothbrush. It also includes  tiny pieces of debris like paint flecks. There are around 23,000  objects larger than 10 cm (4 inches) and about 100 million pieces of debris larger than 1 mm (0.04 inches). Tiny pieces of junk might not seem like a big issue, but that debris is moving at 15,000 mph (24,140 kph), 10 times faster than a bullet.  At that speed, even a fleck of paint can puncture a spacesuit or destroy a sensitive piece of electronics. In 1978, NASA scientist  Donald Kessler described a scenario where collisions between orbiting pieces of debris create more debris, and the amount of debris grows exponentially, potentially rendering near-Earth orbit unusable. Experts call this the “ Kessler syndrome.” Nobody is in charge up there The United Nations  Outer Space Treaty of 1967 says that no country can “own” the Moon or any part of it, and that celestial bodies should only be used for peaceful purposes. But the treaty is mute about companies and individuals, and it says nothing about how space resources can and can’t be used. The United Nations  Moon Agreement of 1979 held that the Moon and its natural resources are the common heritage of humanity. However, the United States, Russia and China never signed it, and in 2016 the  US Congress created a law that unleashed the American commercial space industry with very few restrictions. Because of its lack of regulation, space junk is an example of a “ tragedy of the commons,” where many interests have access to a common resource, and it may become depleted and unusable to everyone, because no interest can stop another from overexploiting the resource. Scientists argue that to avoid a tragedy of the commons, the orbital space environment should be seen as a  global commons worthy of protection by the  United Nations. The lead author of a  Nature article arguing for a global commons filed an  amicus brief – a type of outside comment offering support or expertise – on a case that went to the  US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in late 2021. The author and his research collaborators argued that US environmental regulations should apply to the licensing of space launches. However, the court declined to rule on the environmental issue because it said the group lacked standing. National geopolitical and commercial interests will likely take precedence over interplanetary conservation efforts unless the United Nations acts. A new treaty may emerge from the work of the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs, which in May 2023 generated a  policy document to address the sustainable development of activities in space. The UN can regulate the activities of only its member states, but it has a project to help member states craft national-level policies that advance the goals of sustainable development.

NASA has created and signed the  Artemis Accords, broad but nonbinding principles for cooperating peacefully in space.

More from Explainers

Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar Giorgio Armani will: Who will get the inheritance? What happens to his fashion empire?

They have been signed by 28 countries, but the list does not include China or Russia.  Private companies are not party to the accords either, and some  space entrepreneurs have deep pockets and big ambitions. The lack of regulation and the current gold rush approach to space exploration mean that space junk and waste will continue to accumulate, as will the related problems and dangers.

This article is republished from  The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the  original article.