Why is Japan's monetary policy so unpopular with banks?
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan's central bank has been pursuing quantitative easing for the past five years to spur consumption in the world's third largest economy, but its policies have also made it unpopular with banks due to pressure on their earnings. WHAT POLICIES HAS THE BOJ PUT IN PLACE? The Bank of Japan has been buying large volumes of government bonds in the open market to lower long-term bond yields.
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan's central bank has been pursuing quantitative easing for the past five years to spur consumption in the world's third largest economy, but its policies have also made it unpopular with banks due to pressure on their earnings.
WHAT POLICIES HAS THE BOJ PUT IN PLACE?
The Bank of Japan has been buying large volumes of government bonds in the open market to lower long-term bond yields. It also has a negative interest rate policy, which keeps short-term yields at minus 0.1 percent.
WHY IS THE BOJ DOING THIS?
The BOJ is doing this to meet its 2 percent inflation target, which it says is necessary to prevent a return to deflation that plagued the economy for nearly two decades.
HOW IS THE POLICY SUPPOSED TO WORK?
Quantitative easing pushes down yields and interest rates, which in theory encourages borrowing and pushes up consumer prices.
WHAT WENT WRONG FOR THE BANKS?
The first sign of trouble came shortly after the BOJ began quantitative easing in April 2013.
The BOJ's government debt purchases were so large that they crowded out participation from other banks and investors. Trading volumes fell and there were even days when certain government bonds went untraded.
As a result, investment banks earned less in commissions from bond trading.
HOW DID NEGATIVE RATES AFFECT THE BANKS?
The BOJ adopted negative interest rates in January 2016 by charging banks 0.1 percent on a small portion of their reserves.
Traditionally, commercial banks lend money to some customers and use the interest from those loans to pay out interest on savings deposits. The difference between interest earned from loans and interest paid on deposits is called the margin.
When margins are large, it is easy for banks to turn a profit.
The negative interest rate policy, however, cut margins in half, and it became more difficult for banks to make money.
WHAT HAPPENED TO BOND YIELDS?
The yield spread, or the difference between yields on 2-year and 10-year government debt collapsed in 2016 as yields on both tenors went into negative territory.
Investors typically rely on big moves between short- and long-term yields to make money. When the yield spread narrows, this becomes more difficult. Investors also lose money when they buy bonds with negative yields.
Banks and some economists began to worry that negative long-term yields would discourage more investors from trading debt.
HOW HAVE NEGATIVE INTEREST RATES IMPACTED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS?
Since the policy began in January 2016, negative rates have cost banks on average around 95 billion yen ($849.66 million) in interest paid on reserves, according to Reuters calculations based on BOJ data.
Some analysts say banks may have lost even more money due to the decline in lending rates caused by negative interest rates.
HAS THE BOJ ADDRESSED THESE CONCERNS?
In September 2016, the BOJ said it would allow 10-year bond yields to trade around zero percent with a new policy called yield curve control.
This helped pull 10-year yields out of negative territory, but the BOJ would only allow 10-year yields to move in a narrow range of 0.1 percent above and below zero.
However, moves in bond yields were so small that trading remained unprofitable.
Short-term rates remained in negative territory, making it difficult to earn money from lending. As a result, bank earnings are down 20 percent from their peak in fiscal 2014.
In July, the BOJ said it would double the range for 10-year bond yields to 0.2 percent and lower the amount banks have to pay because of negative rates, but industry leaders say monetary policy is still hurting banks.
($1 = 111.8100 yen)
(Reporting by Stanley White; Editing by Sam Holmes)
This story has not been edited by Firstpost staff and is generated by auto-feed.
By Robin Emmott and John Irish | BRUSSELS/PARIS BRUSSELS/PARIS France and Germany will agree to a U.S. plan for NATO to take a bigger role in the fight against Islamic militants at a meeting with President Donald Trump on Thursday, but insist the move is purely symbolic, four senior European diplomats said.The decision to allow the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to join the coalition against Islamic State in Syria and Iraq follows weeks of pressure on the two allies, who are wary of NATO confronting Russia in Syria and of alienating Arab countries who see NATO as pushing a pro-Western agenda."NATO as an institution will join the coalition," said one senior diplomat involved in the discussions. "The question is whether this just a symbolic gesture to the United States
BEIJING Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday called for greater efforts to make the country's navy a world class one, strong in operations on, below and above the surface, as it steps up its ability to project power far from its shores.China's navy has taken an increasingly prominent role in recent months, with a rising star admiral taking command, its first aircraft carrier sailing around self-ruled Taiwan and a new aircraft carrier launched last month.With President Donald Trump promising a US shipbuilding spree and unnerving Beijing with his unpredictable approach on hot button issues including Taiwan and the South and East China Seas, China is pushing to narrow the gap with the U.S. Navy.Inspecting navy headquarters, Xi said the navy should "aim for the top ranks in the world", the Defence Ministry said in a statement about his visit."Building a strong and modern navy is an important mark of a top ranking global military," the ministry paraphrased Xi as saying.